theonlymikey
New member
- Apr 21, 2016
- 789
Wow.
That is vital to know about.
Fraud obviously not a concern of yours.
Wow.
That is vital to know about.
Depends on the details, I guess.
If he's been cheating on his partner, and shagging any number of legal, consenting adults - agree - not big news - except as an illustration of his character.
Unless of course, his method of seduction, involved further misuse of public funds, favours or privileges.
Wow, I think that graph was George Osborne's wet dream from about 2012. The reality as of 22nd October 2019
The UK's public finances have slipped further into the red after the government borrowed billions more than expected in the first half of the year.
The gap between income and expenditure was £7bn higher than in the same period last year, official figures revealed, leaving the UK on course for an annual deficit of £50bn.
And with the Tories Little England Brexit disaster looming and a spending arms race with Labour looming, I'd say your graph is now pure fantasy
...in the opinion of "The Sun".A screen-shot from 20 years ago because that was the last time Labour had an electable leader.
Fraud obviously not a concern of yours.
Corbyn = Messiah,Johnson = anti-Christ in his simplistic view.
Thanks, that doesn't make good reading, how does this compare to other countries? Sorry to be a numpty but if you ran a High Street business like that you would end up in the gutter.
Which party is best for finance?
It's not my graph.
This is a similar one from the ONS - again showing the deficit increasing, massively, under Labour, continuing as the Tories came into power and then began reducing as austerity took hold.
I don't really have a point to this - I'm certainly not using it as a way to kick Labour (I'm not) nor defend the Tories (I'm certainly not). I do believe that the deficit would have continued to be high post-2010 if Labour had retained power, but that's symptomatic of the country trying to recover from the global financial crisis (note: I'm not saying it was Labour's fault), and not policy.
View attachment 117283
So going over the side is fraud?
Wow, again.
So going over the side is fraud?
Wow, again.
Surely it shows the deficit rocketing as a result of the global financial crisis.
Well it obviously is, if your route into her pants, is facilitated by public money, yes.
The cash and access to trade missions is the issue.
It's not my graph.
This is a similar one from the ONS - again showing the deficit increasing, massively, under Labour, continuing as the Tories came into power and then began reducing as austerity took hold.
I don't really have a point to this - I'm certainly not using it as a way to kick Labour (I'm not) nor defend the Tories (I'm certainly not). I do believe that the deficit would have continued to be high post-2010 if Labour had retained power, but that's symptomatic of the country trying to recover from the global financial crisis (note: I'm not saying it was Labour's fault), and not policy.
View attachment 117283
You believe the Express? If so, it is a shame you won't be able to vote as you will be entombed in 8 feet of snow come election day.
Arguing with a joke? Nice. Won't bother with levity again.Whilst the Express is an utter abomination, I'm not sure what that has to do with that piece which is simply reporting polls undertaken by others.
You can read the same thing here if it helps: http://britainelects.com/polling/westminster/
(Clearly polls come with a whole heap of caveats regardless)
So going over the side is fraud?
Wow, again.