Ethelwulf
Well-known member
Since starc was out 111 has been added for lost of just smith
Of course I am biased and don´t let facts get in the way but surely you can agree that this has happened too often and really stupid tactics don´t help?This series we’ve generally been going through their tailenders quite effectively, and we’ve also scored quite well down the order!
You wouldn’t want to bat last.Nicely set up now.
We were inserted, so Boycott cricket didn't win. I do think Boycott cricket should go in the OED.Bazball has got us to 2-1 down and a below par score on day 1 at The Oval. Funnily enough " Boycott Cricket " often works.
We were at least a hundred below par . Aussies are a distance ahead.
Of course I am biased and don´t let facts get in the way but surely you can agree that this has happened too often and really stupid tactics don´t help?
110 for the last 3 wickets is poor bowling or superb batting.
I would suggest the former but am sure you would say it´s the latter.
it was out! 3rd umpire got it wrongView attachment 164232
Looks out to me.
The initial decision seemed the correct one. It was only when they looked at it afterwards for a long period of time it was found the angle of the replay may have been deceptive and Smith was out.View attachment 164232
Looks out to me.
But the decision wasn't about whether he was in his crease or not. It was about whether Bairstow had dislodged the bail before the ball was in his gloves.View attachment 164232
Looks out to me.
Well, if we played under a roof I think Anderson would have his place back for a few more years.
I remember nets at Sussex where I couldn't control the swing.
From the massive screen next to me it looked out. Not sure why we could see it and 3rd umpire couldn'tThe initial decision seemed the correct one. It was only when they looked at it afterwards for a long period of time it was found the angle of the replay may have been deceptive and Smith was out.
Unless 3rd umpires are allowed half an hour or so to look at a review then these things happen. He probably was out, but the 3rd umpire had to make a decision without a team of forensics pawing over it.
Annoying, but just needs to be accepted and left behind.
Shame really, I quite like the idea of a (former) Australian captain being run out by a sub fielder who looks about 12. Anything to annoy the skippys.
Maybe they should have 'zing' bails in Test cricket.