I like your first suggestion.It was a very long post tbh - I’ve frequently been bullied/ trolled/mocked on this forum by people (included certain mods) for the length of my posts (most of which have been much shorter than Peter’s above’ and often had TLDR at the end of something I have written - so CD isn’t the only one that has an aversion to long posts. No one called those NSCers that criticised the length on my posts ‘delusional’ so I’m not sure that is a valid reason to do so here. Some people just find it difficult to get through so much info on a football chat forum. At least that was the argument given to me a few months ago. Personally I am very conscious now of trying to keep the length down a bit. I have found bullet-pointing paragraphs and key points in long posts can make them less dense.
I think the problem for CD he is right in that more people respond to his posts than they do to anyone else’s simply because he is one of the small minority on the other side of the political debate, so he does has a much larger task in getting through them if he is to exercise his right to respond to criticism.
I don’t think anybody needs to be abusive though on either side.
Of course the obvious answer would be for him to just stop posting what have widely been proven to be outlandish claims about the 2020 election, conspiracy theories, misrepresentations about Trump’s indictments and glaringly poor judgment of character when it comes to the MAR-A-LAGO MAGA-MAN.
But that would turn this thread into an echo chamber and make it very boring
As for the second, there are others who put the 'not Biden' argument well. But they have put it, proper put it, put, putted, and moved on. They are not on a campaign trail. That's the problem with our friend who is according to himself, mostly on NSC for the football. And the fact that he seems to think he can persuade us to vote for Trump shows that he doesn't really understand how the American electoral system works.
