Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] The 2024 US Election - *MATCH DAY*

Who will win the 2024 Presidential Election?

  • President Joe Biden - Democrat

    Votes: 3 0.7%
  • Donald Trump - Republican

    Votes: 173 41.9%
  • Vice President, Kamala Harris - Democrat

    Votes: 217 52.5%
  • Other Democratic candidate tbc

    Votes: 20 4.8%

  • Total voters
    413
  • This poll will close: .








Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
14,206
Cumbria
I don’t know how people on this thread are calling the result with so much confidence when every US and global political pundits are saying it’s too close to call 😎. Personally, I think it’s really (albeit educated) guess work and some wishful thinking thrown in based on politically biased stories doing the rounds on X and Fb, skewed betting odds and unreliable polling - I think I will stick to what I don’t know and that is who will win this election 🙂
Interesting article in the Guardina about polling

 
















Jackthelad

Well-known member
Mar 31, 2010
1,071
I’m normally good at predicting who will win. I have no idea in this vote, I suspect it will be very close.
 








Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,883










Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,468
Brighton
I find it odd that people think betting (which Republicans are being pushed to do massively, for obvious reasons) is a better indicator of what’s happening than actual factual turnout and voting patterns (ie what’s actually happening!)
 
Last edited:


jordanseagull

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
4,151
You understand what’s happening with the betting patterns?
Someone saying they’re 99% sure of something would put their view of the odds at 1/100. Harris is 6/4. It’s a silly, exaggerated Twitter claim no matter what’s going on.

It would be reasonable to argue Harris should be the favourite given the evidence, though.
 


jordanseagull

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
4,151
I find it odd that people think betting is a better indicator of what’s happening than actual factual turnout and voting patterns (ie what’s actually happening!)
I assume that person has put a whole wedge on an implied 1.01 at 2.40 then - opportunity of a lifetime!
 




US Seagull

Well-known member
Jul 17, 2003
4,637
Cleveland, OH
She could have had a go...maybe endorsing the one that isn't a narcissistic, autocratic, Putin loving, climate denier 🤦‍♂️
Yeah, I get that voting for the "lesser of two evils" isn't entirely satisfying. But if you think Harris isn't climate-friendly enough, the alternative is the actively climate hostile.

Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here