grummitts gloves
New member
Hemed up top on his own, Knocky and Murphy to supply the ammo. Sidwell in the middle with Kayal and Stephens for a bit more grit and to break down Hull attacking. Rest BZ.
Despite four very welcome lovely wins, the last three homes games I feel have showed a real lack of ball retention. We should have had more of the ball than 53/47 against Bolton, and Brentford was only 35%, Huddersfield we have 38% despite winning both those games. We really will be found out against better sides if we don't have the ball enough. Because we have 2 up front and attacking wingers, we seem too eager to get the ball forward into channels, we've been looking more and more like a long ball side - all be it its worked in the last 4 games.
I certainly wouldn't be upset to see us lining up with 5 across the middle on Tuesday, Hemed most likely deserves to keep his place.
After 70 minutes on Sat I do not expect BZ to start. I expect him to be replaced by Sidwell who will 'float' in midfield behind Hemed. I would like to keep both our wingers starting as they are our main threat and hopefully will cause Hull to exercise some caution.
After 70 minutes on Sat I do not expect BZ to start. I expect him to be replaced by Sidwell who will 'float' in midfield behind Hemed. I would like to keep both our wingers starting as they are our main threat and hopefully will cause Hull to exercise some caution.
Who could best play the second striker role in the Albion side behind a target striker? That is same role that Gerard played in his latter years for Liverpool (not always). I would chose Lualua but this would practice on the training ground.
I see Sidwell more of a defensive midfielder.
Who could best play the second striker role in the Albion side behind a target striker? That is same role that Gerard played in his latter years for Liverpool (not always). I would chose Lualua but this would practice on the training ground.
I see Sidwell more of a defensive midfielder.
Kayal advanced, with Sidwell next to Stephens.
Lua Lua is not disciplined enough to play that position IMO.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/35529434
Just looking at the BBC match preview. In their comment about previous encounters they describe it as the home team won both 1-0. To me, that implies the home team tonight won both games which of course they didn't. Are the BBC wrong or have they just worded it badly, ie they should have put 'on both occassions the team playing at home won 1-0'?
Stockdale
Bruno Goldson Dunk Calderon
Knockaert Stephens Kayal Murphy
Wilson Hemed
Subs
Ankergren; Rea; Sidwell, Crofts, Skalak, LuaLua; Zamora
They won't like to be facing a 4-4-2 formation, not with the pace of Wilson in the middle.
Instinct tells me to load up the midfield with the inclusion of Sidwell or Crofts - at the expense of a second striker. However, this will only allow Hull to push further up the pitch and most likely blunt our goal-scoring threat.
I concur, the inclusion of Knockaert, Murphy AND Wilson in the team will keep their defence on edge and also increase our chances of a goal, even at the expense of conceding.
Of course, the inclusion of Calderon in any formation is sadly a weakness. You gotta love him, but he's no longer first-team material.
Although setting up for 4-5-1 sounds good and try and Nick a point, if you go up there and try to win this, it'd be a massive team boost and put us in a great position for an automatic position. I'd take the chance and play to win the game. If we loose, so be it, we're pretty much nailed on for a playoff spot anyway so just go for it I say and play 4-4-2