Spurs ask to replay West Ham game

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Bigtk

Active member
Nov 20, 2005
997
Tottenham have written to the Premier League to ask if they can replay Sunday's game against West Ham.
Ten Tottenham players were hit by food poisoning before the 2-1 defeat, which ended Spurs' hopes of playing in next year's Champions League.

"Our match at West Ham was effectively a cup final," said Spurs chairman Daniel Levy in an open letter to Premier League chairman Dave Richards.

"Our chances were significantly reduced by the exceptional circumstances."

Levy added that Tottenham's cause was supported by other clubs and he was expecting to be granted a replay.

He added: "We now have confirmation from a majority of Premier League clubs that they would support a replay and in similar circumstances would expect the game to have been postponed.

"We therefore formally request that you order that the game be replayed."

Our governing body put us in an impossible situation and gave a significant advantage to Arsenal

Spurs chairman Daniel Levy

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Premier League board will convene and discuss the contents of Tottenham's letter

A Premier League spokesman

Tottenham needed to match Arsenal's result against Wigan to finish above their rivals and secure fourth spot in the league as well as an opportunity to qualify for the Champions League.

But defeat combined with Arsenal's 4-2 win over Wigan left Spurs in fifth and a place in the Uefa Cup instead.

The Premier League told Spurs they could delay the match until later in the day to give their players time to recover from illness, but the police said they would not sanction a kick-off time after 1700 BST - only two hours after the game was due to begin.

Spurs could have gone ahead and postponed the game until another day, but they would have risked Premier League sanctions, including a points penalty.

BBC Sport understands that because Spurs opted to play the game instead of postponing it and then arguing their case at a hearing, they will not be granted a replay.

The Premier League has said it will discuss the contents of Levy's letter at a meeting on Wednesday.

But a spokesman said: "Tottenham fulfilled their fixture and as far as the Premier League is concerned the result stands."

But Levy believes the Premier League was "inconsistent in its approach".

"In being given no viable option to postpone the match other than a two-hour delay to kick-off, our players were denied the possible opportunity of competing in the Champions League," he said.

"Also, our fans have been left with a sense of suspicion and injustice at the way subsequent events unfolded.

"We played the game with players who were unwell but who were desperate not to let their fans and colleagues down.

"Clearly, our governing body put us in an impossible situation and gave a significant advantage to Arsenal in competing for that fourth position.

"The Premier League was inconsistent in its approach in being prepared to consider the kick-off to be delayed but not allowing the match to be played on a different day."

Probe into Spurs illness outbreak

Food samples from the Marriott Hotel in east London where Spurs stayed before the West Ham game are being tested by health authorities.

An official criminal investigation has not been launched.
 
Last edited:






Silver flying chariot

Active member
Aug 5, 2003
461
oh dear!! they really are desperate

:lol: :lol:

Can we ask the league to replay all our games again this year "just in case" we can beat them this time.

What an absolute joke
 










CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,097
I didnt' realise they argued about who was being subbed as so many of them wanted to come off. It does seem a bit harsh as they couldn't play for fear of shitting themselves.

Still, I hope they fail as I f***ing HATE SPURS!

:)
 






Charles 'Charley' Charles

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2005
3,571
The Mile Of Oaks
I'm not saying it's right, but if we had got a sniff of the ref getting a backhander against Wendy then we would of pulled out all the stops to get the game replayed
 


Les Biehn

GAME OVER
Aug 14, 2005
20,610
If it had been Arsenal the game would never have gone ahead, David Dein would have seen to that.
 


Lammy

Registered Abuser
Oct 1, 2003
7,581
Newhaven/Lewes/Atlanta
I can fully understan where Spurs are coming from. It's not like it was one or two top players. It was 10 players FFS!

I'm not sure we would even have enough to field a side if that happened to us. The only reason it wasn't delayed is because West Ham have the cup final coming up. Which is undistandable.

Simple really if you want to win just poison the other team!
 








Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,830
Uffern
Don't know about the meal they had but it seems that Spurs have plenty of sour grapes.
 




SussexSpur

New member
Jan 24, 2004
1,696
Finchley
Can't see us getting the replay, and did have mixed feelings about how far we should push this previously, but I do admire Levy's actions here. (edited to clarify)

For what it's worth, Levy's letter, on the Spurs site, does make some intriguing and convincing points, especially the revelation that the England doctor it was insisted was sent to the Spurs hotel hadn't even arrived nor seen anyone when the Premier League announcement - at Highbury - that the game would go ahead was made.
And that a majority of other Premiership clubs now back our case for a replay.

Levy's being seen to make a stand. Pointing out the flaws in the Premier League's handling of this, and potentially repeat circumstances.
Preparing the ground to at least get a few million by suing, either way.
And trying to whittle away David Dein's power at the FA...

To dare is to do, Rodders...
 
Last edited:


Bigtk

Active member
Nov 20, 2005
997
Changed my mind now just remembered that spurs had the choice to go ahead with the game or not and went ahead with it. Why should they then get to replay it.
 




CHAPPERS

DISCO SPENG
Jul 5, 2003
45,097
Bigtk said:
Changed my mind now just remembered that spurs had the choice to go ahead with the game or not and went ahead with it. Why should they then get to replay it.

Hmmm, they were offered a delay of two hours or nothing but decided to play it instead of having the delay as it was pretty pointless given the nature of the ilnesses. Given that his was their only choice that's not technically true.
 




Wardy

NSC's Benefits Guru
Oct 9, 2003
11,219
In front of the PC
If they back down over this then we are setting a danagours precednet
 


Charles 'Charley' Charles

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2005
3,571
The Mile Of Oaks
Bigtk said:
Changed my mind now just remembered that spurs had the choice to go ahead with the game or not and went ahead with it. Why should they then get to replay it.

I was under the impression it was a police decsison the game should go ahead at that time as they didn't want the fans hanging round the pubs. Spurs had to play or risk losing points, a la Middlesborough in 1997, when they refused to play a match
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top