beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 36,026
The issue of staffing is down to Southern. If the staff collectively or individually choose to work overtime or on days off, that's up to them. But to believe that not working overtime is a form of industrial action is pathetic and insulting. There is no contractural obligation for any member of staff to work overtime or on days off, yet the refusal - for the most part - of staff to do so on behalf of a company which is treating them like shit, is somehow being used as a stick to beat them with.
lets be clear, i've been very careful to not accuse the staff of anything around the overtime, im open minded whether the lack of staff available to cover is due to Southern's threatened ban or individual's decision to not work overtime. i expect a combination. there's nothing insulting about this, it is a recognised form of industrail action and is perfectly in their rights to do so, but lets not pretend it isnt a cause of problems. if the staff were working all the overtime, then services would be running as "normal" (which for Southern is everything a little bit late).
we agree on something, that the strikes have been counterproductive, as it has brought blame on to the union and members where it was once wholey on Southern.