- Oct 12, 2022
- 2,787
@Is it PotG? I’ll get off the fence in a minute and tell you how I really feel about it.
You endlessly use irony. By now I really would have thought you could employ it a bit more effectively; this is pathetic and not at all interesting.
seems like bullshit, to me
cash in the attic on later! meanwhile, i'll desperately trawl the internet for some sophistry cos i'm OUTRAGED
Would that be the pension plan he got when he left the DPP under the regulations created by the then-Tory Government under David Cameron?
Was subject to the rules, agreed by others, for the job he had. Where’s the hypocrisy exactly?
Imagine being accused of hypocrisy by Conservatives. Are they being ironic?
Oh dear, you are repeating silly claims from CCHQ. Sir Keir Starmer's DPP pension is too small to take advantage of the new rule, and he hasn't paid anything into it, since 2013.
Starmer, comes across as decent, but dull, but in reality is he just another skin deep socialist ?Would that be the pension plan he got when he left the DPP under the regulations created by the then-Tory Government under David Cameron?
I only ask because surely it's only hypocrisy if a) he earned enough during that period to exceed the allowance and b) we're saying that he should have opted out of a Government-sponsored pension plan on the off chance he ended up in opposition to a Government that makes a living robbing from the poor to give to the rich?
Maybe read the half dozen odd posts before yours?..Starmer, comes across as decent, but dull, but in reality is he just another skin deep socialist ?