No, you made a comment about purdey's and 'badly dressed suburban oiks' does no-one escape the ire of your class prejudice? it's only now that you've managd to conjure up the 'staghunting' excuse, and why are you talking about lamping ? this thread is about foxhuting, you know, with horse and hounds etc, try going to do a real job , with real targets ,and real pressure and you might come across as less of a humourless class warrior.No, I made a lighthearted post about stag shooting which is what the shotguns referred to. That said I assume you know what lamping is and that is the main legal way of dealing with foxes? Try avoiding the Devils Dandruff and you'll come over as less of a humourless oaf.
No, you made a comment about purdey's and 'badly dressed suburban oiks' does no-one escape the ire of your class prejudice? it's only now that you've managd to conjure up the 'staghunting' excuse, and why are you talking about lamping ? this thread is about foxhuting, you know, with horse and hounds etc, try going to do a real job , with real targets ,and real pressure and you might come across as less of a humourless class warrior.
Banning it was a complete sop to the left wing, as "New Labour" tried to retain its support the working class flat cap wearers.
and when people start eating foxes, then you can compare it to fishing.
people eat carp for xmas dinner here (believe it or not)...so...no reason to believe it cant be eaten there.
Pike is also very edible.
but its not eaten here, except the game fish trout and salmon. im sure a bit of stewed fox is a treat too.
can someone answer a simple question for me ,
a lot of people on here are totaly against fox hunting because its cruel (so they say) not because of all the nobs all dressed up , and all the rich fuckers that hunt(so they say)
so are you really telling me that putting a live maggot or worm on a hook (not cruel) then dropping this baited hook in front of a fish , then letting the fish fight against a rod , line ,angler and the big hook in its throat is (not cruel ) is ok, the fish is then dragged onto the shore or river bank where it is dispatched , now before you say we eat the fish , what about the 100s of makeral that are caught off the piers in the summer , thrown in a bin liner to go rotten before being dumped .
no i am sorry like it or not if the working class went fox hunting none of the antis on here would be antis , its all about the upper crust , sad bunch some of you lot .
by the way i have never hunted foxes , but love fishing !!!
sadly this arguement is unbalanced so cannot be answered simply
in my view it is only correct to catch a fish to eat it. An animal should not be subjected to that for no reason.
Also (as far as I can think of) fishing is actually a very quick method of killing the animal. Sadly there is no easier fairer way to catch than with a hook so that cant be avoided, but the fish is CLONKED on the head to kill it quickly as little suffering involved.
People don't hunt foxes for meat. If they did then I wouldn't be against the killing of the animal in a quick manor(or shooting),
but to chase it on horse back with hundreds of blood thirsty dogs trained to rip it apart for no reason other than a kick is NOTHING like catching an animal quickly or food.
There is a CLEAR difference.
I would love to have the opportunity to do the catering for a fox hunting gathering...I would trawl the roads of the countryside and gather up as much road-kill as I could find (foxes, badgers, rabbits...and those piles of fur that you aren't really sure about) then turn the whole lot into sausages and pies...served up a treat to go with the stirrup cup!
Why are you persisting with the class theme?
Its feck all to do with class.. working class people work the hunt.