Tyrone Biggums
Well-known member
They used to allow slavery too.
Until a shit load of guns brought a stop to that...
They used to allow slavery too.
Yep, they also didn't have semi automatic state of the art military grade guns. Flintlock pistols was as advanced as it was at the time of the constitution.
The Pink Pistols, an LBGTQ group dedicated to protecting the gun rights of gay and transgendered individuals, has issued a response to the Orlando terror attack and to calls for gun bans. The group is urging the public not to jump to conclusions and to focus on the violent acts carried out by ISIS follower Omar Mateen, not on the tool he used.
“The Pink Pistols gives condolences to all family and friends of those killed and injured at Pulse,” First Speaker of the Pink Pistols Gwendolyn Patton said in a statement. “This is exactly the kind of heinous act that justifies our existence. At such a time of tragedy, let us not reach for the low-hanging fruit of blaming the killer’s guns. Let us stay focused on the fact that someone hated gay people so much they were ready to kill or injure so many. A human being did this. The human being’s tools are unimportant when compared to the bleakness of that person’s soul. I say again, GUNS did not do this. A human being did this, a dead human being. Our job now is not to demonize the man’s tools, but to condemn his acts and work to prevent such acts in the future.”
Say what you like about Mike Ashley but one thing I've never been offered in Sports Direct when taking my son in for a new pair of footie boots is a Mossberg 500 Pump Action Shotgun.
A proportion of the population are gay.
Obviously it follows that a proportion of the gun-happy, right-to-bear-wildly-unsuitable-arms brigade, will also be.
What's your point?
It's a point of view from the gay community which we've yet too see openly expressed that often.
That Islam is a big threat to gay people due to Islams views on homosexuality.
It's a point of view from the gay community which we've yet too see openly expressed that often.
That Islam is a big threat to gay people due to Islams views on homosexuality.
No - its a point of view from (a specific branch of) the gun lobby, telling us yet again, that people being massacred by easily obtained automatic weapons, has nothing to do with easily obtained automatic weapons.
Why were they masacred? Why that group of people?
Doesn't say anything about Islam being a threat to gay people? You appear to have drawn that conclusion yourself.
You'd have to ask the dead guy. I'd SURMISE that it was a combination of mental instability and discriminatory hatred - quite possibly fuelled by religious beliefs.
I know for certain though what facilitated the SCALE of the massacre.
Either way, none of that is the POINT of that gun group's statement. Its opportunism - a perfect chance for them, as gun-worshippers, to add their five pence to the debate. "Hey everyone - even us gays don't blame the gun".
I think you've missed their point. They aren't worshipping it, they are realising its a valid form of defence for their own lives.
Thus they are telling other gays to arm themselves.
I think you've missed their point. They aren't worshipping it, they are realising its a valid form of defence for their own lives.
Thus they are telling other gays to arm themselves.
Tanks would be a valid form of defence, why is there no call for gays to buy and drive around in tanks?
Security at the club were armed. The police outside were armed. 50 people are dead.
Because you can't carry one in your bumbag der