Is it?
I hope you're right.
The idea that we are too frightened of Putin launching the nukes to do anything is, in my opinion, not a good look.
If I were Putin I'd notice that, and crack on.
I agree
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Is it?
I hope you're right.
The idea that we are too frightened of Putin launching the nukes to do anything is, in my opinion, not a good look.
If I were Putin I'd notice that, and crack on.
Some of you have apparantly been posting messages of truth as reviews on google maps - an excellent idea. Someone even posted 'instructions' on NSC how to do it. However, such instruction were of no more use to me than a foreign language like 'clear your cache' or 'switch off your VPN'. Might as well be Chinese!
So, for a bit of practical help in spreading the truth to Russians using MacDonalds, can somebody set out simple instructions to set up a new (anonymous) Google account? Thank you.
Not sure that any Russian officer that senior would find himself in bullet range of danger ? I would like to think it's true as an officer is a legitimate target in a war rather than an elected President.Quite a few posts on Twitter (amongst the majority celebrating) saying this isn’t true and is a result of an account being hacked……..difficult to know what to believe at the moment.
There is still a huge reluctance to escalate by putting " Boots on the ground " as we know Putin is unhinged and his response could be brutal.Not impressed with the response from UK and USA on this.
At what point do we do anything?
It looks to me like we will do nothing (having said we would do nothing).
Putin has won, has he not?
There is still a huge reluctance to escalate by putting " Boots on the ground " as we know Putin is unhinged and his response could be brutal.
However, there is a point, unknown as yet, when an atrocity so bad is committed that a government is forced to act in support of Ukraine. That might be the watershed moment and you might see a rapid domino effect of countries taking up arms.
I notice that the Polish Ambassador is refusing to leave Kyiv, would his death or injury at the hands of the Russians constitute the international incident that would trigger the above I wonder ?
So just 2 oligarchs sanctioned in the UK since the war started. Yes just 2, or am I missing something?
I have from the start of the invasion, had a feeling Poland will be dragged into this and more than likely willingly to help their cousins across the border.
Did the Russians not actually attempt to start a nuclear war yesterday and last night targeting a nuclear power plant.
Surely that’s a clear and present danger showing their intent, win at any means.
Waiting for them to press the button first, is the only conscious option, but NATO must have grounds to go in after an attack with the intent for massive casualties of a nuclear plant….
Can someone explain to me if I’m wrong about that, genuine question.
I have from the start of the invasion, had a feeling Poland will be dragged into this and more than likely willingly to help their cousins across the border.
Did the Russians not actually attempt to start a nuclear war yesterday and last night targeting a nuclear power plant.
Surely that’s a clear and present danger showing their intent, win at any means.
Waiting for them to press the button first, is the only conscious option, but NATO must have grounds to go in after an attack with the intent for massive casualties of a nuclear plant….
Can someone explain to me if I’m wrong about that, genuine question.
My wife did say that. I had "assumed" that big companies would be approached by someone more important than me. Maybe that will be next weeks plan.
Nope. We can give ourselves a pat on the back preventing innocent paralympians from competing in a games they'd worked all their lives for most likely with very little funding or support, but we cannot put sanctions on oligarchs who profited directly following the fall of the Soviet Union. Our moral compass is something akin to Jack Sparrow's.
do you mean you?
Whilst I don’t disagree with you about the oligarchs, I don’t think UK were responsible for banning the athletes, that was an IOC decision made under pressure from most of the other members no?
We have family near the power plant, and it was being defended by Ukrainian troops - it seems the Russians were attacking and shelling the perimeter, which they had been a few days ago too (unreported on BBC etc). Russians now control the site as far as we know. The shelling was reckless in the extreme, but if they'd wanted to blow it up it's a big and easy target.I have from the start of the invasion, had a feeling Poland will be dragged into this and more than likely willingly to help their cousins across the border.
Did the Russians not actually attempt to start a nuclear war yesterday and last night targeting a nuclear power plant.
Surely that’s a clear and present danger showing their intent, win at any means.
Waiting for them to press the button first, is the only conscious option, but NATO must have grounds to go in after an attack with the intent for massive casualties of a nuclear plant….
Can someone explain to me if I’m wrong about that, genuine question.
Going slightly off topic, does anyone else find BBC’s Naga Munchetty both irritating and rude in her interview technique?
Going slightly off topic, does anyone else find BBC’s Naga Munchetty both irritating and rude in her interview technique?
So just 2 oligarchs sanctioned in the UK since the war started. Yes just 2, or am I missing something?
Anita Clifford, a London-based lawyer who specialises in financial crime, said while there was a low threshold for the designation of sanctions, it still required a proper dossier of evidence or it could be challenged in court, and the government could be sued for large sums.
I actually agree with a lot of what he says, but there is a time and a place. Bit like having an argument with a relative in hospital or something like that.
Humanity first, ideology and history lessons later. A young child being passed over to crowds to be put onto a train isn't interested in the undeniable mistakes and sometimes dodgy views of Churchill.
.. and neither should they be.