- Jul 7, 2003
- 47,630
That's very brilliant. Now for NSC . . . ?
I'll give Bozza a call
That's very brilliant. Now for NSC . . . ?
The Guardian has a 'make this website royal baby free' button which is great.
What name do we reckon they'll give it?
QUOTE]
Boris, innit.
because on this occasion it is the birth of a royal monarch
The Guardian website is providing constant coverage, as are all the nationals, but, quite amusingly, has a small button in the top right corner of its homepage reading Republican?, which, if you click on it, removes all the Royal stories instantly from the page
I've only been up 10 minutes and I'm fed up with it already - there must be some important news this morning.
Working at home today and I normally work with the TV on, with the cricket won it's going to be a long day
It's all boring though isn't it, they could decide to tell me about the earthquake in China this morning but instead they tell me about the royal baby, as that's more important.The only boring thing here are the predictable bed-wetters moaning about the coverage and the royals in general. PATHETIC.
The royal family is all a load of crap, just a way of making a bit of money, that's it, anyone who finds this story interesting or is FOLLOWING it in great interest needs to be shot.
The only boring thing here are the predictable bed-wetters moaning about the coverage and the royals in general. PATHETIC.
3 Kings?
Edward VII, George V, Edward VIII, George VI
I don't count the Duke of Windsor as he was never crowned.
He was still King though, hence him having to abdicate. You can't abdicate from a position you've never held.
Presumably on the same grounds you celebrated the Diamond Jubilee this year as Elizabeth II wasn't crowned until 1953?
There was the diamond jubilee and the 60th anniversary of the coronation.