Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Royal brith



Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
47,630




Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
47,630




Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,866
because on this occasion it is the birth of a royal monarch

Not necessarily. Hopefully we'll be a republic long before the royals in front of little Muhammed or Fatima die.
 


Doc Lynam

I hate the Daily Mail
Jun 19, 2011
7,347
The Guardian website is providing constant coverage, as are all the nationals, but, quite amusingly, has a small button in the top right corner of its homepage reading Republican?, which, if you click on it, removes all the Royal stories instantly from the page :lolol:

Thought i would check out The Sun's website and there's hardly a mention.
 




Canonman

New member
Apr 14, 2011
792
I've only been up 10 minutes and I'm fed up with it already - there must be some important news this morning.

Working at home today and I normally work with the TV on, with the cricket won it's going to be a long day

This Royal Brith worries me.
 


Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,922
West Sussex
The only boring thing here are the predictable bed-wetters moaning about the coverage and the royals in general. PATHETIC.
 






mikeyjh

Well-known member
Dec 17, 2008
4,607
Llanymawddwy
The royal family is all a load of crap, just a way of making a bit of money, that's it, anyone who finds this story interesting or is FOLLOWING it in great interest needs to be shot.

As is the X Factor, as is Premier League Football, doesn't stop them being great products that millions of people love....don't be so frigging pompous.
 


Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
47,630
I'm most looking forward to hybrid x's views on this subject.

He's no doubt camped outside Buckingham Palace waiting for news as we speak.
 


Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
47,630
...
 














Frutos

.
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
May 3, 2006
36,305
Northumberland
I don't count the Duke of Windsor as he was never crowned.

He was still King though, hence him having to abdicate. You can't abdicate from a position you've never held.

Presumably on the same grounds you celebrated the Diamond Jubilee this year as Elizabeth II wasn't crowned until 1953?
 




Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
He was still King though, hence him having to abdicate. You can't abdicate from a position you've never held.

Presumably on the same grounds you celebrated the Diamond Jubilee this year as Elizabeth II wasn't crowned until 1953?

There was the diamond jubilee and the 60th anniversary of the coronation.
 




Nibble

New member
Jan 3, 2007
19,238
Agreed. I get bored when my favourite progs do a birth episode. Or weddings. Dull as ditchwater unless it's yours.
 


Frutos

.
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
May 3, 2006
36,305
Northumberland
There was the diamond jubilee and the 60th anniversary of the coronation.

I know, but as you don't regard Edward VIII as King due to his not having been crowned I can only assume that you ignored last year's Diamond Jubilee completely and recognised only this year's events?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here