Stato
Well-known member
- Dec 21, 2011
- 7,367
It's an interesting tactical move from Sunak. Talk has been that he couldn't sack Braverman because the lunatic right wing would come for him. By sacking her and bringing back Cameron, he's attempting to align himself more centrally and be seen to be turning back to a bit of normality.
It might outflank the loonies, but he forgets that, as Johnson might have phrased it (although he would probably have referenced Suetonius, not Robert Graves), Cameron was the one who played the role of Claudius and "Let all the poisons that are in the mud hatch out." I recall that Danny Dyer put it more eloquently. Cameron is no longer seen by the public as one of the grown-ups in the room, he's the idiotic gambler who's massive arrogance caused the sh*tshow of the last seven years.
It might outflank the loonies, but he forgets that, as Johnson might have phrased it (although he would probably have referenced Suetonius, not Robert Graves), Cameron was the one who played the role of Claudius and "Let all the poisons that are in the mud hatch out." I recall that Danny Dyer put it more eloquently. Cameron is no longer seen by the public as one of the grown-ups in the room, he's the idiotic gambler who's massive arrogance caused the sh*tshow of the last seven years.