Razak returns to City

[seagullsovergrimsby]

I wasn't too impressed with Razak at Donny , he seemed unmotivated and disinterested after the huge Donny defenders outmuscled and jostled him off the ball most of the time. At Forest he came on as a sub (replacing Vicenté) but didn't have an impact.

 

[Paddy B]

Didn't he have behaviour issues when on loan at Palace? I am not a conspiracy theorist but I am sure there is more to this

 

[LamieRobertson]

Give me razak over dicker anyday

one good game?...yur easy to please

 

[Stat Brother]

One outstanding game then nothing

But what a game, any other season that would have been the outstanding match of the season.

 

[Westdene Wonder]

Razak was class in the limited time he was used,cant blame him for returning to Man City if he is going to sit on a bench then it might as well be a Premiership one.
It must be realised that top teams loan out players to gain experience,if they dont get playing time it will be noted and we wont obtain the young class players that could transform our team.

 

[ALBION28]

One outstanding game then nothing

This sums it up. He is young and will need to search for consistency if he is to make it.

 

[nick c]

Give me razak over dicker anyday

Your joking of course,on what basis do you come to this conclusion.Razak has played one good game for us,the other at Doncaster was pitiful,whereas Dicker has been consistently a good solid player for us,arguably our MOM yesterday and he's our's,not some overpaid so called superstar from man city who doesn't really care about us or our club.

 

[Deleted member 18477]

Give me razak over dicker anyday

This. Gus you dickhead.

 

[severnside gull]

Maybe it's as simple as Assulin wants to stay and Razak doesn't?

the simple answers are not only invariably the best but also the most likely to be correct

 

[Mutts Nuts]

Razak has gone back to Man City. Shame it didn't work out especially after his performance against Ipswich.

Not surprised he came to play games not sit in the fcuking dressing room, some of Guses team choices have been very strange recently.

 

[Driver8]

Not surprised he came to play games not sit in the fcuking dressing room, some of Guses team choices have been very strange recently.

If he had played a bit better when given the chance perhaps he would have kept his spot.

 

[LABHA]

He pissed Poyet off....end of.

Going with this,also,if you saw him play at Doncaster,he looked div 1/2 player,not prem by a long way.

 

[Mr Burns]

Give me razak over dicker anyday

Can't do that. Then we'd have no one in the squad who fully understands Gus' way of playing

 

[BRIGHT ON Q]

don't you mean one very promising game at hull when he came on,one superb game against ipswich,one poor game at doncaster and then no more chances.bloody joke.

 

[Zebedee]

Give me razak over dicker anyday

Me too.

 

[bhawoddy]

He pissed Poyet off....end of.

This can only be the reason he hasnt figured. Perhaps he gave it all the billy big bollox and gus f***ed him off. Dont think it had a jot to do with dickers return as razak is a lot better than dicker IMO.

 

[Thunder Bolt]

He lost out to Vicenté before Dicker had made his comeback.

This is correct but it gives the naysayers something to moan about when they think that Razak lost out to Dicker.
Now, think about it - Razak or Vicente? I know who I would rather choose.

 

[HawkTheSeagull]

More to this than we probably know, but i wouldnt be surprised he he was getting pissy at the fact he wasnt being played and asked to go back.

Didnt he throw his toys out of the pram before the Pompey game as he wasnt in the squad ? Do we need a player with an attitude like that ?

 

[Horton's halftime iceberg]

Rumours were it was all about attitude and not ability.

Gus doesn't just pick players just on ability.

 

[GingerBeerMan]

Give me razak over dicker anyday

Have you ever seen Dicker play?