Pevenseagull
meh
- Jul 20, 2003
- 20,821
Boo
Sky are spot on asking why he was asked to go to the screen in the first place.Correct decision from Stuart Atwell.
And it's not often you get the chance to say that.
Well. Silva did jostle the keeper prior to the header.Hate to say it but right decision, goalie wasn’t obstructed
Or fire them up for a vastly improved
We can do something against them on November 9th.Pep is undeniably brilliant but it’s shocking how poor City are without Rodri.
Sky are spot on asking why he was asked to go to the screen in the first place.
Wasn’t offside at the time of the jostle though. When the header comes in he’s ducking out of the way.Well. Silva did jostle the keeper prior to the header.
On radio they are offering a different view ..Silva backs into the goalie who has to push him out the way and is inhibited from coming for the cross …offside
AgreedHe nudges the 'keeper as the ball is crossed in - mid flight - thus stopping the goalkeeper coming to claim it. He's effected the goalkeeper and therefore, for me, that shouldn't have stood.
He nudges the 'keeper as the ball is crossed in - mid flight - thus stopping the goalkeeper coming to claim it. He's effected the goalkeeper and therefore, for me, that shouldn't have stood.
Not in an offside position until Stones heads it.That is going to hurt for Wolves, and the manner of that defeat can only benefit us for next week.
And that wasn't a goal. Bernardo has backed into the keeper whilst in an offside position, affecting Sa's ability to come for the ball and his abilty to react to the header.
Bernardo has backed into the keeper whilst in an offside position