Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Poll – Which way did you vote and do you want free movement of people

Which way did you vote and do you want free movement of people?

  • I voted leave. I want to keep free trade (inc services) and the free movement of people with the EU

    Votes: 15 11.1%
  • I voted leave. I don’t want keep free trade and the free movement of people with the EU

    Votes: 20 14.8%
  • I voted remain. I want to keep free trade (inc services) and the free movement of people with the EU

    Votes: 97 71.9%
  • I voted remain. I don’t want keep free trade and the free movement of people with the EU (confused)

    Votes: 3 2.2%

  • Total voters
    135








Shropshire Seagull

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2004
8,790
Telford
They are separate issues, but you tend to get one with the other. We're not going to accept free movement while having no trade, and they're not going to give us free trade without us accepting free movement.

Not sure this is entirely true. Depends on the full definition of free trade and free movement. I think we have free trade with many of our commonwealth cousin-countries but still with restrictions on movement of people.

Someone pointed out that when we joined the EU we were NINE countries with no "riff-raff".
The EU is now 28 countries and growing .... but not with our generosity and welcoming nature any more.
 


El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,009
Pattknull med Haksprut
This jolly person has a good idea....


FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE I SAY!



AS SOMEONE RIGHTLY POINTED OUT EARLIER.



HAVE THE ARMY AND THE ARMED RESPONSE UNITS ON OUR BORDERS! AND ROUND THE CHANNEL, AND OUR BORDERS THROUGHOUT!!!!

NOT JUST THE CHANNEL, THE WHOLE OF THE UK... PUT ARMED GUARDS ON... SHOOT TO KILL.... DEFLATE THE BOATS, AND IF THEY ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO MAKE THE JOURNEY, LET THEM DIE IN THE CHANNEL...... IT WILL STOP THE NEXT BOAT FROM TRYING THE SAME FATE.... NONE OF THIS COZY- "WE WILL RESCUE YOU!" - THAT JUST GIVES THE WRONG MESSAGE. DO NOT RESCUE THEM! IF THEY DROWN - GOOD RIDDENS! AND IF THEY MAKE IT TO DOVER OR THE SOUTH EAST COAST, PUT THEM STRAIGHT BACK ON A COASTGUARD OR ARMY BOAT- STRAIGHT BACK TO CALAIS! STOP BEING SOFT UK.... LET THEM DIE!



WE HAD THOUSANDS OF BRITISH WAR VETERENS THAT DIED HERE, TRYING TO STOP AN INVASION FROM GERMANY! IT WAS CALLED WORLD WAR 2!!!!!



THESE SCUM JUST WANT TO RAPE OUR WOMEN, MOLEST OUR CHILDREN, AND SURVIVE DAY TO DAY, ON BURGLARIES AND ROBBING YOUR HAND-BAG AND MOBILE PHONE! I HAVE NO SYPMATHY.

THEY HAVE SECURITY IN FRANCE. THE ONLY REASON THEY WANT TO GET TO DOVER, IS THEY ARE GUARANTEED A FREE COUNCIL FLAT, AND £67 QUID JSA- JOB SEEKERS ALLOWANCE- SOMETHING THEY DO NOT GET IN GERMANY FRANCE SPAIN, OR ITALY...... ONLY THIS GOVERNMENT IS STUPID ENOUGH TO IVE THEM IT!!!!!



GET THEM OUT... MAKE IT CLEAR- YOU ARE NOT WANTED ... SHOOT THE B******s! !!!!!!

Blimey, how did you get an advance copy of Katie Hopkins' next column for the Mail?
 


alfredmizen

Banned
Mar 11, 2015
6,342
Fair enough, but don't think many Brits need or possibly have the guts to go to another country to find work. Back in the Eighties my mate went over to leipzig looking for Brickie work. He was with a gang of five, the site wanted three and they promptly escorted the other two back into france to make their way home.

Surely we must find a way to control this. I know part of the problem is our own government but in Bognor we have the migrants stacked 10 to a flat undercutting the local workforce and demoralised youngsters priced out of jobs. These people have felt they have no choice but to believe in Brexit. Others may choose to mock them but when you have nothing, you have less to lose.

I looked into the pro and cons of this decision and some of the remainers concerns don't match my concerns. Being in the construction industry it has been a struggle to earn a wage to cover the bills that were easily affordable only 5 years ago.

All this didn't need to happen if Gordon Brown had given us the referendum at the Lisbon treaty stage, which the clown didn't even turn up on time to sign. In my opinion the country would have kicked the EU into touch.

This decision has, albeit temporarily ripped my family apart. The well off in my family remain and the not so lucky are leave.

I did not vote for Farages white UK dream. He is a relic of the tebbit era of diplomacy, but i was forced to side with his anti EU stance. The EU commission has become something bigger than it was set up to be.

Democracy, who'd have it😥



Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk
Leipzig ? In the 80's ? I bet he didnt ......
 




goldstone

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 5, 2003
7,177
You don't have an option for:

I voted leave. I want to keep free trade, but not the free movement of people. Which is after all what we initially signed up for.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,183
Goldstone
Not sure this is entirely true. Depends on the full definition of free trade and free movement. I think we have free trade with many of our commonwealth cousin-countries but still with restrictions on movement of people.
But they don't expect the free movement of people and they don't share as big a market with us. It is what the EU expect.
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,183
Goldstone
You don't have an option for:

I voted leave. I want to keep free trade, but not the free movement of people.
I didn't include it as I don't think we'll be able to get it.
 






beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,019
There is one possible alternative, which was raised by the deputy leader of the German CDU this morning - the idea that we can have free trade (including passporting, so more or less single market membership), with some limits on migration, if we are willing to pay more into the EU. Not sure how that would go down with the electorate, given the fuss about the "£350m", mind.

can always rely on the Germans to look for pragmatic solutions. the word "rebate" came up immediate i read this, which has always irritated the French as they have to provide most of it, so could get them onboard. remember its not just about immigration though, if it includes Danish style opt-out on a wider range of directives, that could satisfy all parties.

bottom line, and something else that someone from Germany apparently recognised, EU needs to split into those on the periphery and those on the core, or change in other ways. this is needed to reconcile the Euro anomly and the fact that every country simply doesnt want deep political integration.
 


But we're leaving the EU. The Treaty of Rome will not apply any more. It's a negotiating position.

The Treaties of the EU will continue to apply to all 27 member states. These (including the ToR) will apply to any deals, arrangements etc we may have with the EU post-exit so they will have to comply; hence your negotiating position is a non-starter.
 




Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
17,774
Fiveways
So it's now pretty clear, and Merkel has just confirmed this, that the first two options of the choice that [MENTION=4019]Triggaaar[/MENTION] indicates in this poll is upon us. Merkel said no cherry-picking and that the situation for those outside the EU will be worse than for those inside, and she's the one that we really need to pay attention to in this situation. So, access to the single market and continued immigration, or no movement of peoples and no single market?
It seems as though we've taken back control, only to be confronted with a situation where it's patently apparent that we're not in control.
 


BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
You guy's are still licking your wounds and have been so vocal Remainers that you still hope beyond hope you will be proved right somehow, anyhow even at the detriment of the UK.

Its horrible to watch ...............................
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,183
Goldstone
Merkel said no cherry-picking and that the situation for those outside the EU will be worse than for those inside
That's her starting position.

It seems as though we've taken back control, only to be confronted with a situation where it's patently apparent that we're not in control.
In what way are we not in control? It's exactly as I thought it would be.
 




Blue Valkyrie

Not seen such Bravery!
Sep 1, 2012
32,165
Valhalla
The good thing is that even if we insist on ditching free movement and are denied access to the free market because of it, then we can still apply again at any time after that when the economy subsequently disolves and the country bankrupts itself.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,830
Uffern
You guy's are still licking your wounds and have been so vocal Remainers that you still hope beyond hope you will be proved right somehow, anyhow even at the detriment of the UK.

Its horrible to watch ...............................

Think you've picked the wrong thread for that comment.The overwhelming number of people on this thread are Leavers
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,183
Goldstone
Think you've picked the wrong thread for that comment.The overwhelming number of people on this thread are Leavers
Over 70% of the poll on this thread are 'remainers'
 






Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,183
Goldstone
Yes but most of the comments are from leavers - that's what I was thinking of
Maybe, I'm not counting, but the remainers can read the points and comment if they want. Most people on NSC are remainers.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here