Milano
Well-known member
When people give these ratings are they rating the player on their ability or on their impact to the game?
You see I would rate Stephens as a 6 (average) on Saturday, that being a 6 based on HIS ability, he had an average game for him. Had Propper put in that performance I would have rated him a 5 as I think he is a better player.
I’ve felt for a few weeks that Stephens was putting in 7-8 performances by his standards, this was never going to last, I don’t think on Saturday he was that bad by his standards I just think he’s a limited player at this level, unfortunately a Stephens ‘average’ rating of 6 negatively effects the team.
So how do others do their ratings?
You see I would rate Stephens as a 6 (average) on Saturday, that being a 6 based on HIS ability, he had an average game for him. Had Propper put in that performance I would have rated him a 5 as I think he is a better player.
I’ve felt for a few weeks that Stephens was putting in 7-8 performances by his standards, this was never going to last, I don’t think on Saturday he was that bad by his standards I just think he’s a limited player at this level, unfortunately a Stephens ‘average’ rating of 6 negatively effects the team.
So how do others do their ratings?