hailshamseagull
Member
- Feb 21, 2009
- 141
Murray at least looks as though he is interested lately, Dickinson even got shouted at a few times in the warm up for poor touches/passes, just looks very disinterested and lazy.
absolutely ridiculous ratings. We f***ing won!!!! Against a potential banana skin team. I know most people think we're amazing and should be winning every game 10-0 but can't you just be satisfied with a win for once? I think we played to our strengths in the 2nd half and got the job done.
So Dickinson was better than Forster yesterday?A Striker is there to get goals.
Dickinson scored 2 goals = good job.
Dickinson -4. I don't care if he scored 2 goals, his constant falling over, holding his face, his feet, his knees, any part of body he can think of drives me mad. He has so many good assets - good touch/control, very tall, reasonably mobile and a decent shot, and yet put it all together and he
is pretty useless. Just get on with it and play and he could be quite good.
.
absolutely ridiculous ratings. We f***ing won!!!! Against a potential banana skin team. I know most people think we're amazing and should be winning every game 10-0 but can't you just be satisfied with a win for once? I think we played to our strengths in the 2nd half and got the job done.
Smith 4 - Just not cut out for it. Kicked the ball off the pitch twice, lets the ball under his body, sorry but not good enough.
Hoyte 5 - Poor game, didn't seem to be concentrating at times and kept cutting inside needlessly when he should've been marking his man.
Virgo 4 - Just hoofs everything, should've been fighting for his place but looked worse than ever.
Elphick 4 - Really lost any kind of composure he had towards the end of the game, giving the ball away at will and clearing it to the opposition or into the stands when there was no pressure on him.
El Abd 6 - Not a dreadful game by his standards, gave away a needless foul on the edge of our box though.
McLeod 6 - A couple of delightful balls over to Forster, would prefer if he got into more dangerous areas more often, fitness still letting him down a little.
Navarro 4 - Was he on the pitch? Game completely passed him by, not even half the player Dicker is.
Crofts 5 - Worked hard and put himself about but not enough end product, will be disappointed with his performance.
Bennett 6 - Not great by his standards but linked up well a couple of times with Forster. Seems to have caught Cox's disease of being unable to beat the first man with a dead ball.
Forster 6 - Worked hard and you had to feel for him playing alongside a thicket with no spacial awareness whatsoever. Laid into Dickinson a couple of times for being lazy and useless.
Dickinson 2 - That's 1 each for each tap in to an empty net. I don't know if I've seen a worse performance from a player ever. He has the first touch of a drunken elephant, no awareness of his team mates at all, lazy, clumsy, dives and just generally lumbers/staggers around for 90 minutes. Everyone around me was falling about laughing when he scored our third.
SUBS
Dicker 7.5 - THAT is a central midfielder. Composed, classy, NEVER gave the ball away, made things happen, fantastic movement to make space for himself. Has to start every game when fit.
Hart 7 - Worked his nuts off, chased every ball, got a bit too heated at points, also completely laid into Dickinson for being lazy.
No, he didn't come on.Was it me or did cox come on yesterday ? nobody has given him a mark - he must have been anonymous.
Dickinson 2 - a mark for each goal. A truly horrible player to watch and I really hope we sell him in the transfer window. He has the ball control and first touch of a drunken bull, falls over ALL THE f***ing TIME, cannot head a ball despite being 6ft 4in and is as lazy as sin. But hey he scored two tap ins against Rushen and Diamonds so obviously he is a football genius.
two tap ins? Well, that's the first time I've seen a tap in from outside the area and another from 10 yards into the top corner.