Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,274
HKFC, I think you've got it. In which case what a cunning plan - a plan more cunning than a fox that used to be Professor Of Cunning at Oxford University.
£15 million
Tactical voting. It means that two who actually wanted Russia or Spain, voted instead for Holland in round 1, to see a potential threat in England eliminated early. Then, once we were out of the running, they switched their vote. That's how it works.
England's vote went to Russia then that's bitterly disappointing and suggests Geoff Thompson is a long way out of touch - Spain and Portugal (financial concerns aside) would have provided and infinitely better World Cup than Russia IMHO.
.....
2. Is tactical voting against the rules?
......
I disagree. Firstly England and Spain/Portugal's bids were relatively similar in that both had all the infrastructure in place. I'm happier to lose to Russia who made a big thing about how it will be a catalyst for improvements in their infrastructure.
Also Spain hosted it in 1982, 16 years more recently than us. Russia have never had it, and if FIFA wanted to take football to all areas of the world then Russia was a better choice than Spain.
qatar 2022.
worst. world cup. ever.
And I guess one was our own!
Presumably Geoff Thompson.
Only 2 votes leads me to believe our bid wasn't as great as we were told and that the bid team were completely out of touch with reality.
Russia's whole bid about improving them as a country is a joke, there basically saying once your developed to actually be capable to hold a world cup you should not be allowed to. Plus why is some French **** in charge of football?