thedonkeycentrehalf
Moved back to wear the gloves (again)
- Jul 7, 2003
- 9,415
So good to see the return of this thread
Be careful of the rose-tinted spectacles ...Every single old photo is better. stylish, pretty, nicer.
There are also less people and cars, and so less signage, barriers, traffic lights etc.
It makes me wonder why we now build such ugly buildings with little detail or flourishes.
im sure the reality was much worse and "we have never had it do good"
show me one decent modern building......
I would disagree to a point. Although young I remember the 60’s & 70’s reasonably well and don’t recall the town being grotty or run down. There was a proper parks and gardens dept that kept the same well maintained, the parks having Parkies to deter any bad behaviour. The Madeira Terraces, West Pier, Black Rock and Rottingdean pools were all in great condition. There was no tagging or graffiti and there were only a few celebrity tramps like “spare ten pence” and “cigar butt up the nose Desmond” around. London Road was like a small version of Western Road with department stores. There was little rubbish on the streets as there were regular street cleaners back then. One downside is that no one picked up dog shit so I was forever digging it out of the bottom of my plimsolls with a matchstick.Be careful of the rose-tinted spectacles ...
Not sure how old you are but I remember Brighton in the 60s and 70s, even the 80s, and despite the nice pictures it was grotty and run-down. Like a lot of British seaside towns it had seen better days (and as Brighton's heyday was the Regency and early Victorian eras - MUCH better days), and at this time it was memorably described by Keith Waterhouse as a seedy town that 'looked like it was always helping the police with their enquires.'
Now of course it's re-invented itself, quite successfully, as Hipster Central, but your point about the modern buildings though is sadly accurate.
You must have been a mate of Bill Posters. He was always being prosecuted.Even in the 1990s there was endless shops that seemed perpetually closed. I never had enough anti nazi league or gig posters to cover the amount of available spaces.
I don't think Bill was ever actually prosecuted. They just used to say they would.You must have been a mate of Bill Posters. He was always being prosecuted.
I'm pretty sure that outside a few notable buildings, most of Brighton in the regency/early victorian era would have been ramshackle fishing / semi agricultural slums.Be careful of the rose-tinted spectacles ...
Not sure how old you are but I remember Brighton in the 60s and 70s, even the 80s, and despite the nice pictures it was grotty and run-down. Like a lot of British seaside towns it had seen better days (and as Brighton's heyday was the Regency and early Victorian eras - MUCH better days), and at this time it was memorably described by Keith Waterhouse as a seedy town that 'looked like it was always helping the police with their enquires.'
Now of course it's re-invented itself, quite successfully, as Hipster Central, but your point about the modern buildings though is sadly accurate.
That is a very interesting picture. In the forground is Fortes, which I never knew exsisted, but is the venue for the cafe fight scene in Quadrophinia. I always believed that scene was filmed elsewhere. I'm always getting asked where this place is and now I will print this off to show people.
I planted that Kaulreutia paniculata (the tree coming out on the left), in 1985.View attachment 179899
View attachment 179900
Assorted random unknowns in Pavilion Gardens. Interesting to see how much more interesting the design of the gardens is now rather than just the grass.
Disagree with this completely- Almost the whole of Brighton’s seafront (behind the modern hotels are from the regency era - wide sweeping crescents, town houses and public facilities- Brighton has a fantastic regency heritage and was turned into a leading fashionable bathing resort by the Prince Regent and Martha Gunn of course. Our Victorian heritage is even more visible - rows and rows of Victorian terraces throughout the town, the piers, the station and an absolute plethora of churches, notably those of the Oxford movement, the Wagner churches with their fantastic stained glass windows. You can not go anywhere in Brighton (unless it is onto the satellite housing estates) without seeing it steeped in Regency and Victorian history.I'm pretty sure that outside a few notable buildings, most of Brighton in the regency/early victorian era would have been ramshackle fishing / semi agricultural slums.
On the plus side, most people would have been too busy dying of cholera or being hanged for sheep rustling to tag anything.
The gardens are beautiful now - I remember when they were being restored in the 1980’s and all the work that had gone in to find archives and literary references to the original Regency gardens that were designed by John Nash in 1815-22View attachment 179899
View attachment 179900
Assorted random unknowns in Pavilion Gardens. Interesting to see how much more interesting the design of the gardens is now rather than just the grass.
Absolutely.Disagree with this completely- Almost the whole of Brighton’s seafront (behind the modern hotels are from the regency era - wide sweeping crescents, town houses and public facilities- Brighton has a fantastic regency heritage and was turned into a leading fashionable bathing resort by the Prince Regent and Martha Gunn of course. Our Victorian heritage is even more visible - rows and rows of Victorian terraces throughout the town, the piers, the station and an absolute plethora of churches, notably those of the Oxford movement, the Wagner churches with their fantastic stained glass windows. You can not go anywhere in Brighton (unless it is onto the satellite housing estates) without seeing it steeped in Regency and Victorian history.