Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Ok, how big IS Falmer?



bigc

New member
Jul 5, 2003
5,740
That arrangement still applies at Withdean and will apply at Falmer. The problem is that, whilst Falmer Station has the capacity to deal with about 3,500 passengers travelling to and from a match, it can't cope with more. Imagine the queues after a match.

LB, that raises a point I'd always been meaning to ask you. If a game is at Falmer, would there be scope to increase the four trains per hour you get to the station from Brighton/Lewes? Or would four prove to be sufficent? I'm not an expert on these matters but I'd assume due to the stadium being further out and the station closer, many more people would use the train for Falmer.
 




The frequency of trains can certainly be increased. As can the length of them - but within limits.

The best way to run more trains between Brighton and Falmer is to run the extra trains as shuttles between Brighton and Lewes. And that's where the problems kick in. There is limited capacity to terminate trains at Lewes and the platforms on the Brighton line at Lewes aren't long enough to take an eight-carriage train, nor can they be lengthened. Even if the platforms at Falmer were lengthened, there would still be a limit to how many people could be carried by train to and from matches.

What the Club need to be thinking about is how they can persuade people to stay behind after a game, so as to spread departure times over as long a period as possible.

Cheap Harvey's? Post-match meals? Pornographic ice spectaculars?
 


Oct 25, 2003
23,964
could shuttle trains be organised between JUST falmer and brighton lord B?

otherwise, surely the number of buses could be increased? this would surely be easier than increasing the number of trains?
 


could shuttle trains be organised between JUST falmer and brighton lord B?

otherwise, surely the number of buses could be increased? this would surely be easier than increasing the number of trains?
I think they'd just clutter up the line as they struggled to reverse and cross on to the other track for the journey back into Brighton.

Buses are easier. But, as the evidence given to the Public Inquiry showed, there is a limit to how many are available.
 


Oct 25, 2003
23,964
hmmm

you have a fair point

surely some form of deal could be struck with brighton & hove buses.....if not for buses, but for coaches? we've been good customers in the past have we not? even if its extending the number 25 route and laying on coaches/buses on top of that? that could take a strain off the trains
 




bigc

New member
Jul 5, 2003
5,740
The frequency of trains can certainly be increased. As can the length of them - but within limits.

The best way to run more trains between Brighton and Falmer is to run the extra trains as shuttles between Brighton and Lewes. And that's where the problems kick in. There is limited capacity to terminate trains at Lewes and the platforms on the Brighton line at Lewes aren't long enough to take an eight-carriage train, nor can they be lengthened. Even if the platforms at Falmer were lengthened, there would still be a limit to how many people could be carried by train to and from matches.

Well I assume it wouldn't be hard to get it up to 5 trains an hour, by then the Ashford diesel train might not even be running if the plans to cut back on Eurostar there goes through.

Would 5 trains from the period 1.40-2.40 not be enough?(I may be being stupid here), but I'm sure it could help carry a sizeable number of supporters. Then of course there are the ones that would travel from Lewes to Falmer, which could comprimise a fair few people too.
 




Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,868
Burgess Hill




Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,868
Burgess Hill
thanks again Lord B, that does help to explain the limitations. So the only way we could conceivably get more train throughput would be to extend Lewes & Falmer stations to be able to handle 12 coach trains. Is that even remotely possible, in say, 10-15 years time?
 


British Bulldog

The great escape
Feb 6, 2006
10,974
The frequency of trains can certainly be increased. As can the length of them - but within limits.

The best way to run more trains between Brighton and Falmer is to run the extra trains as shuttles between Brighton and Lewes. And that's where the problems kick in. There is limited capacity to terminate trains at Lewes and the platforms on the Brighton line at Lewes aren't long enough to take an eight-carriage train, nor can they be lengthened. Even if the platforms at Falmer were lengthened, there would still be a limit to how many people could be carried by train to and from matches.

What the Club need to be thinking about is how they can persuade people to stay behind after a game, so as to spread departure times over as long a period as possible.

Cheap Harvey's? Post-match meals? Pornographic ice spectaculars?

The main problem will occur after matches when fans are trying to get from Falmer back to Brighton, With the old signalling system there is on that line a train can't leave Falmer for Brighton before the previous train has arrived in Brighton station.
 


Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,868
Burgess Hill
The main problem will occur after matches when fans are trying to get from Falmer back to Brighton, With the old signalling system there is on that line a train can't leave Falmer for Brighton before the previous train has arrived in Brighton station.

Is that for real? If so, is it gonna get upgraded by the time the stadium is built?

I presume that an upgrade of the points/signals was not part of the stadium plan!!
 




British Bulldog

The great escape
Feb 6, 2006
10,974
Is that for real? If so, is it gonna get upgraded by the time the stadium is built?

I presume that an upgrade of the points/signals was not part of the stadium plan!!

Yeah it's for real, And there's no plans for any upgrading of signalling or stations anywhere on that line except for a new foot bridge at Falmer station.
 


Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,868
Burgess Hill
Yeah it's for real, And there's no plans for any upgrading of signalling or stations anywhere on that line except for a new foot bridge at Falmer station.

I thought there were plans to extend Falmer Station, not just upgrade the footbridge.

So I presume this is where the 5 trains per hour limit comes from.
 


Screaming J

He'll put a spell on you
Jul 13, 2004
2,403
Exiled from the South Country
The main problem will occur after matches when fans are trying to get from Falmer back to Brighton, With the old signalling system there is on that line a train can't leave Falmer for Brighton before the previous train has arrived in Brighton station.

I thought it had been upgraded. After all, its not semaphore but colour light now?

Would it cost that much, BB, to install another section (I think that's what its called) at either Moulescoomb or London Road - that would increase the capacity. In fact why IS signalling so expensive - its only a few poles and light bulbs!!

And if they were really clever they could use the old platform 4 at Lewes - from memory its still only covered up with gravel.
 




British Bulldog

The great escape
Feb 6, 2006
10,974
I thought there were plans to extend Falmer Station, not just upgrade the footbridge.

So I presume this is where the 5 trains per hour limit comes from.

They can extend Falmer station as much as they want but as Lord B rightly said the problem of longer trains will be at Lewes, And Lewes platforms can't be extended because of the layout there.
 


British Bulldog

The great escape
Feb 6, 2006
10,974
I thought it had been upgraded. After all, its not semaphore but colour light now?

Would it cost that much, BB, to install another section (I think that's what its called) at either Moulescoomb or London Road - that would increase the capacity. In fact why IS signalling so expensive - its only a few poles and light bulbs!!

And if they were really clever they could use the old platform 4 at Lewes - from memory its still only covered up with gravel.

It's a bit more involved than just a few poles and light bulbs. :laugh:

Yeah the line has moved on from the old semaphore signalling but although it's colour light now it's still only 2 aspect signalling which is very slow. I would'nt like to put a price on it but you'd be talking £millions to upgrade that line and the railway would'nt and the Albion could'nt pay for it.
 


Screaming J

He'll put a spell on you
Jul 13, 2004
2,403
Exiled from the South Country
They can extend Falmer station as much as they want but as Lord B rightly said the problem of longer trains will be at Lewes, And Lewes platforms can't be extended because of the layout there.

True but they could use all 3 platforms on the Brighton side of the station and the old platform that used to be there couldn't they? Wouldn't that help capacity; even if the trains can't be any longer you could fit more of them in?
 


Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,868
Burgess Hill
It's a bit more involved than just a few poles and light bulbs. :laugh:

Yeah the line has moved on from the old semaphore signalling but although it's colour light now it's still only 2 aspect signalling which is very slow. I would'nt like to put a price on it but you'd be talking £millions to upgrade that line and the railway would'nt and the Albion could'nt pay for it.


Thanks BB. Looks like were buggered then ???
 




Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,871
The bit about the trains is quite depressing. I knew about the platform length, but I fondly imagined that trains (which after all can be operated from both ends) could just pull into the platform at Lewes, the driver would swap ends, and then it could go back to Brighton again. I fondly imagined a whole fleet of weekday commuter trains (which would otherwise be idle) happily shuttling back and forth between Brighton and Lewes.

The limit of 'only one train between Falmer and Brighton' is archaic - but all too believable. So it looks like our opponents were right, Falmer WAS the wrong place. Is Pende still available?
 


Scoffers

Well-known member
Jan 13, 2004
6,868
Burgess Hill
The bit about the trains is quite depressing. I knew about the platform length, but I fondly imagined that trains (which after all can be operated from both ends) could just pull into the platform at Lewes, the driver would swap ends, and then it could go back to Brighton again. I fondly imagined a whole fleet of weekday commuter trains (which would otherwise be idle) happily shuttling back and forth between Brighton and Lewes.

The limit of 'only one train between Falmer and Brighton' is archaic - but all too believable. So it looks like our opponents were right, Falmer WAS the wrong place. Is Pende still available?

Well, I wouldnt go that far. It seems to me all potential sites would just have different restrictions, most of which would not permit even 22,500 capacity. In all probability, 22,500 is pretty much the max we would have got anywhere
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here