Bristol half marathon winner disqualified after running wrong race
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-58623893
I guess rules are rules but I kind of feel it goes against the spirit of what running should be about. I would have let him keep the win.
Yes, but the other HM runners didn’t know they were running against him.
Both courses pretty well followed the 10K course, with common start and finish lines. The difference was an 11K out and back diversion at 1K for HM runners. There were about half a dozen waves about 30 mins apart, with the elite 10K going early, then HM waves, then 10K mass waves. All runners were warned in advance to watch out for two split points – one at 1K and another one (for a small diversion) at 9K/20K – with a clear message “10K runners keep left”.
This guy would probably have won the 10K by a couple of minutes, so would have already been clear and on his own at 1K when he made the wrong choice. The first he knew something was wrong was when he passed the six-mile marker but couldn’t see the finish, so he asked someone where it was. Seven miles away was the answer! Realising his mistake, he decided to run the HM instead, adjusting his pace accordingly.
I’m trying to get my head round the timings but I think this is what happened. I believe the elite 10K race should have started at 09:00, though the clock in photos seems to show 9:07. He completed the HM course in 63 mins so would have crossed the finish line at 10:10. At that time the HM leader, having started at 9:30, would have been at about 8 miles, presumably feeling quite relaxed with the lead he had built up over the second placed man. He finished in 67 mins and, at some point, was told he came second.
It is beyond me why the wayward guy was declared the winner of the HM. Although all times posted are ‘chip’, the rules are clear that positions for prizes can only be decided by gun times. His was a different gun!
Common sense has prevailed with the 67-minute man now being declared the winner of the HM. But I don’t understand why the wandering runner has been disqualified. Surely, he can’t be disqualified from the HM because he never entered it? And why disqualify him from the 10K when he crossed the start mat, ran the full 10K course and crossed the finish mat? Missing the turn was his problem, one that cost him about 2000 places. I suppose that runners can be disqualified for failing to keep to the prescribed course, but that rule is designed to stop anyone gaining an advantage. Or maybe he has asked to be DQ’d so that he doesn’t have a 63-minute 10K against his name on Power of 10? That wouldn’t impress the Ethiopian selectors!