The Albion Roar
97.2FM
Burnham is bleating that there should be an inquiry, but his party had more than a decade to set such an inquiry up.
Right - and...?
Burnham isn't 'bleating' - he's campaigning.
Burnham is bleating that there should be an inquiry, but his party had more than a decade to set such an inquiry up.
Disgusting and violent certainly, but suspect they were acting under orders from a higher authority (government), so if anything it would be that higher authority that would be culpable, rather than the police themselves. Still high time that that whole police force was disbanded, like the B Specials were in Northern Ireland, and replaced with a completely new police force, IMHO.
Disgusting and violent certainly, but suspect they were acting under orders from a higher authority (government), so if anything it would be that higher authority that would be culpable, rather than the police themselves. Still high time that that whole police force was disbanded, like the B Specials were in Northern Ireland, and replaced with a completely new police force, IMHO.
Right - and...?
Burnham isn't 'bleating' - he's campaigning.
Only because someone is ordered to do something illegal doesn't absolve them of blame.
Surprise, surprise...........!Quite. But Amber Rudd has decided that that won't be the case.
He had 96 good reasons to get another campaign done first.So why didn't he 'campaign' for an inquiry when his party was in power?
So why didn't he 'campaign' for an inquiry when his party was in power?
Oh yes - the guards at the gas chamber argument. Not sure it applies here - they probably were acting technically within the law, especially if ordered to do so by the democratically elected executive. They did appear to be a bit(!!!) over-enthusiastic though!
He had 96 good reasons to get another campaign done first.
No, but they can make the law, and within existing laws there are various emergency powers which they can invoke, I believe (and no, I don't know exact details, as I'm not a constitutional law expert). There was no excuse for the police to re-enact the charge of the Light Brigade though.A democratically elected executive as no legal right to ignore the law. Some of those officers committed assault. Don't get me wrong, the miners were no angels but that doesn't excuse police officers breaking the law.
So why didn't he 'campaign' for an inquiry when his party was in power?
Probably because he is was not standing to be Mayor of Manchester then
Disgraceful decision not to hold an inquiry. Only yesterday a policeman, who was there on the day, told BBC News they ( the police) were told by senior officers what to write up in their reports. This is exactly the same behaviour employed by the police at Hillsborough. It looks very much like a another stitch up by the West Yorkshire Police. It needs looking at.
Disgraceful decision not to hold an inquiry. Only yesterday a policeman, who was there on the day, told BBC News they ( the police) were told by senior officers what to write up in their reports. This is exactly the same behaviour employed by the police at Hillsborough. It looks very much like a another stitch up by the West Yorkshire Police. It needs looking at.
I used to play football with a former copper who had been among those bussed up to Yorkshire during the miners' strike. He told me that there was violence from both sides but that he saw policeman who needed very little encouragement to wade in. When he mentioned it to a superior he was told in no uncertain terms that he hadn't seen anything of the sort.
Clearly blame on both sides but I wonder what would this country be like today if Scargill had ultimately won his 'war' against Thatcher?