The bloke sounds a bit of a fruitcake, but dont you feel a little bit of a wimp for letting him talk to you like that in front of your other half and not doing anything ?sorry in advance...I just wanted to put this down somewhere
...so I was driving back East along the A27 this evening and got caught in the usual bottle neck by Arundel...I always say to myself that I should go a different way...anyhow, there was about 200 to 300yds to go before the lanes merged into one and I was in the outside lane...all of a sudden this car pulled out from the near side lane and sat in the middle of the two lanes. He obviously wanted to stop me from going ahead in the outside lane and merging ahead...as I said there was another say 200yds to go...so I gesticulated for him to move over...he wouldn't and I then tried to drive around him at which point he swerved in front of me and we both slid to a halt...he got out.
This is, I think the point of my post, he went absolutely mental f'ing and blinding at me and saying that if my other half was not with he would have beaten me up etc. Anyhow I just sat there totally gobsmacked...I said that the lanes merged ahead not where he decided to block the road, but to be honest it did not seem worth tryig to reason with him...
In summary, I just wanted to say that if you were the bloke you need to calm down dude...getting that irate cannot be healthy and you are gonna give yourself a coronary. Also...am sorry mate, but you cannot go around being like that with people and it just reminded me of the road rage stories you hear where people have been stabbed and killed...I never thought I would be stupid enough to get into those situations but it just goes to show you never know...
So go careful out there...
I disagreeTotally within your rights as far as i'm concerned, I never understand when there are still 2 lanes why people only use the nearside lane, if people used both and then merged 1 car from the left lane and 1 car from the left lane it would half the queue length of the n/s lane and cause less of a tailback.
Sorry but I am fully behind the other bloke. It is one of my biggest hates when people can see there is a queue and jump it and push in. I say good for him for sitting in the middle of the lane. I think that takes some bottle.
I don't see it like that at all.
I see it as a queue at the turnstiles at a football ground. I will naturally get in the shortest queue, but if it's not moving fast enough I will change in order to get in quicker. If you can't be bothered to switch then that's your own fault.
Same rules in this situation as far as I'm concerned.
Totally within your rights as far as i'm concerned, I never understand when there are still 2 lanes why people only use the nearside lane, if people used both and then merged 1 car from the left lane and 1 car from the left lane it would half the queue length of the n/s lane and cause less of a tailback.
I disagree
When you have people whizzing down the 2nd lane they tend to clog it all up,one single file is better than two clogged up lanes cramming in at the end.
Maybe the Highway Code doesnt cover politeness and courtesy when driving but think of other road users when driving and a lot of the stress will go away
I'm sorry Uncle Spielberg but your argument is rubbish.
There are two lanes and cars are encouraged to use both, that's why they are there. Where do you draw the line of having to get into a single lane? simplest and most straight forward is the actual point they merge, not 200 yards up the road. As someone has pointed out, it's in the HIGHWAY CODE
People in this country are too precious about queues, infact you're famous (infamous) for it.
If there are two lanes, fill them. Everyone else behind you gets to move up. Problem is people seem to head for the slow lane at the first sign of merging, USE BOTH FRIGGING LANES and we'll all get to where we are going quicker....
Its the tossers who start a long long queue in the slow lane who cause all this stress to be fair...