It might not be the worst idea ......
sorry, didn't mean that
I know where you live
(No I don't. But feel free if you want me to send me flowers and chocolates )
Edit, bugger, you don't know where I live either
Last edited:
It might not be the worst idea ......
sorry, didn't mean that
That is ****ing hilarious! Burgon really is a complete **** and as thick as mince.
Interviewer: "So you would go to Brussels, tell them you want to remain and ask if you can negotiate a deal to leave?"
That is ****ing hilarious! Burgon really is a complete **** and as thick as mince.
Interviewer: "So you would go to Brussels, tell them you want to remain and ask if you can negotiate a deal to leave?"
So no answer then, just going for the "brazen it out" lying option about what a word means, fair enough, Johnson taught you well
Life (and the economy) is changing rapidly - the pace of growing inequality is accelerating - the idea that 18-25s will settle down and get a mortgage flies in the face of the reality of zero-hour contracts, the rise of low paid service jobs, the increasing cost of housing etc. Society has changed dramatically since the 70s, 80s and 90s. Furthermore, the 18-25s (and younger) are the very people who will have to deal with the climate crisis and the reality the we may be hitting irreversible change as they look to settle down and raise a family. There is a dramatic shift occurring among the under 25s in terms of how they view the world and what they are willing to accept. What hasn't happened yet is that the under-25s haven't drawn political conclusions - they are demanding that the politicians 'do something' - but it will not take long for them to realise that the politicians will do nothing and that a mass movement is needed to change society on a global basis.It would be a mistake to hold on to that statistic. People change their voting as they get older. The current crop of 18-25s will settle down, get a mortgage etc etc. I was once in the Young Socialists ! and am now moderate left (I have no problem with Nationalization although think it should happen very slowly).
It is clear why the LP lost the election - a number of factors - not necessarily in order of importance -You need to actually face the reasons you lost working class votes and a failure to do so would be unbelievably irresponsible.
This is the type of rhetoric that is common from people who don't really want anything to change - this is not about 'ideological purity' - the LP manifesto wasn't that radical a manifesto - but the issue comes down to the social, political, economic and environmental crisis that is looming on the horizon and what is necessary to respond and deal with it.Stop searching for ideological purity.
So losing elections over and over again is fine for you as long as you see it reaching some other purpose? You think Kinnock doing that for 9 years is fine? But the left doesn't even get 4?
What you deride as the Momentun formula gained 3 million votes in 2017, the highest jump in the Labour vote since 1945, raising a vote that has been on the decline since 1997.
Two related questions for you (to which there are two short answers): is the over-65 category due to get bigger or smaller into the future?; is the 18-44 category due to get bigger or smaller in the near future?
If you give the right answer to these questions, you might accept that this is even more problematic for the Labour Party.
Apparently more than 20,000 people have joined the LP since the election.
This really isn't true. You perceive it as a load of young militants, but Labour's membership is 70% over 45 year olds, mainly from ABC1 groups. This is the kind of misdirection the new Labour leader will need to address. The perception is very different from the reality.
Apparently more than 20,000 people have joined the LP since the election.
on reflection this isnt very working class... is this part of the problem?
what does working class mean it just does not fit the modern world we are in.
Yes, many have been calling 5Live and LBC. Desperate to oust the Corbynista's from their control.
Probably so that they can stop any more extreme left wing candidates from taking office.
Working class is anyone who works with hand or brain for a wage/salarywell imo working class doesnt means what it used to, a vague label today. however ABC1 is very much not the working classes under under any definition.
Apparently more than 20,000 people have joined the LP since the election.
Working class is anyone who works with hand or brain for a wage/salary
Membership is irrelevant. Labour's party membership is probably 3 times that of the tories but it didn't win them the election.
Working class is anyone who works with hand or brain for a wage/salary
Life (and the economy) is changing rapidly - the pace of growing inequality is accelerating - the idea that 18-25s will settle down and get a mortgage flies in the face of the reality of zero-hour contracts, the rise of low paid service jobs, the increasing cost of housing etc. Society has changed dramatically since the 70s, 80s and 90s. Furthermore, the 18-25s (and younger) are the very people who will have to deal with the climate crisis and the reality the we may be hitting irreversible change as they look to settle down and raise a family. There is a dramatic shift occurring among the under 25s in terms of how they view the world and what they are willing to accept. What hasn't happened yet is that the under-25s haven't drawn political conclusions - they are demanding that the politicians 'do something' - but it will not take long for them to realise that the politicians will do nothing and that a mass movement is needed to change society on a global basis.
There has been talk of terrorism and protecting British society - and the reality is that the real threat of terrorism in the future is likely to be eco-terrorism as a section of the climate change movement (primarily from middle-class backgrounds) reject society and regard eco-terrorism as the only way forward. That is potentially the real terrorist danger for western European society in the future.
It is clear why the LP lost the election - a number of factors - not necessarily in order of importance -
1. The shift from respecting the referendum result in 2017 - to adopting an effectively remain position in 2019 - all bar 3 (I think it was) of the seats that the LP lost were in Leave voting constituencies
2. In Scotland the refusal of Corbyn to support an independence referendum allowed the Tory SNP to claim they were representing working class Scottish voters.
3. Blairite controlled local councils have implemented widespread cuts to local services - in many cases the Tories have been the ones opposing the cuts (like with the library on Hove)
4. A vicious smear campaign directed against Corbyn by the right-wing media - while ignoring the racist, homophobic, xenophobic and anti-Semitic antics of the Tories
5. Blairite MPs attacking Corbyn (as they have done incessantly since he was elected LP leader)
6. Former Blairite MPs calling on voters to vote Tory in order to defeat Corbyn
7. The failure of Corbyn, McDonnell and Momentum to build on the momentum generated by the 2017 election campaign.
This is the type of rhetoric that is common from people who don't really want anything to change - this is not about 'ideological purity' - the LP manifesto wasn't that radical a manifesto - but the issue comes down to the social, political, economic and environmental crisis that is looming on the horizon and what is necessary to respond and deal with it.