- May 8, 2018
- 10,624
Give it to Arry
Can only speak for myself but I’d have been very underwhelmed but then I wasn’t at Fulham THAT eveningAre Saints in financial trouble that they are needing to go cheap…. Would we have been happy after Potter left to have approached Mr Jones ?
We didn’t approach him and I can’t remember him ever being mentioned. When Mrs DiS first mentioned this, I felt distinctly underwhelmed on her behalf…… but maybe they’re right.Are Saints in financial trouble that they are needing to go cheap…. Would we have been happy after Potter left to have approached Mr Jones ?
I don't think it matters where you work or who you work for. If that's your attitude you're not a 'team player'Well, if you work for a firm that sells photocopiers, pedal bins or ceramic mugs, then that may well be the case.
However, if you're sitting on a 3 year contract with a transfer valuation to your employers of circa £55m....maybe not so much.
I was, it was great, but I would have certainly been underwhelmed. In fact, you cannot underestimate (correct use of this phrase in this instance...) how underwhelmed I would have been.Can only speak for myself but I’d have been very underwhelmed but then I wasn’t at Fulham THAT evening
Absolutely agree. The only question is whether Southampton are also a basket case. Probably not as much as Stoke but they have the feel of a club that is tired of the Premier League. It may just be their time to drop down.What was wrong with the first thread?
Oh, it was shit, wasn't it.
For the record, he did well at Luton.
He did badly at Stoke because Stoke were a basket case.
He has exceeded expectations back at Luton
He is a ruthless little bastard, not unfamiliar with the dark arts
And he's an interesting fit for Stains.
Sandra's his world. Triffic!Give it to Arry
Not so much tired of the Premier League. More like a brood mare that has birthed so many foals she is now spent and barren.Absolutely agree. The only question is whether Southampton are also a basket case. Probably not as much as Stoke but they have the feel of a club that is tired of the Premier League. It may just be their time to drop down.
What was wrong with the first thread?
I looked and couldn't find. And still can't having pealed through 3 pages. Was it on another thread? I rarely start threads.
Think Klopp could be added to this list , Roy Hodgson did fairly well without the ego bit but ultimately won little.Indeed. The game is still littered with great players = shit managers.
Famously Wenger and Mourinho did f-all as players, but because of their intelligence and charisma they managed to bypass that and carve out amazing managerial careers. You do need incredible strength of personality, ego and belief to manage that trick though.
Indeed, Paul Sturrock was the manager and James Beattie (who? exactly) was the player. Sturrock (known as Luggy for reasons that are obvious if you know what he looks like) had actually had a distinguished playing career with Dundee United and Scotland but hadn't played or managed in the Premier League, so Beattie, being an ignorant as well as a self-important tw*t, had never heard of him. Luggy is very widely liked in football and admired for his courageous and uncomplaining fight against Parkinson's, whereas Beattie ... isn't. Funnily enough, his own managerial career lasted just 58 games, all at Accrington Stanley. He won just 16 of them.Reminds me of an incident back in the day (90s maybe?) when Southampton appointed a new manager from a lower division - can't remember the bloke's name, sorry. Anyway, at the time Southampton had a youngish player who'd got a couple of England caps - can't remember who that was either ...........................
But at training, on the new manager's first day, his greeting for the new manager was 'Hello, I'm ******* - I'm an England international, don't you know. Would you like my autograph?'
Thanks for filling in the blanks - and a lot more background info. too.Indeed, Paul Sturrock was the manager and James Beattie (who? exactly) was the player. Sturrock (known as Luggy for reasons that are obvious if you know what he looks like) had actually had a distinguished playing career with Dundee United and Scotland but hadn't played or managed in the Premier League, so Beattie, being an ignorant as well as a self-important tw*t, had never heard of him. Luggy is very widely liked in football and admired for his courageous and uncomplaining fight against Parkinson's, whereas Beattie ... isn't. Funnily enough, his own managerial career lasted just 58 games, all at Accrington Stanley. He won just 16 of them.
If City were willing to let them go, then I doubt there's a Phil Foden among them. They all looked poor to average against Newcastle on Sunday.I wish him well - saints did some “interesting transfer“ business in the summer spending over £80m on very young players (most 18-20) including half of Man City youth team - as Alan Hansen said you don’t win anything with kids
Quite an interesting story that.Jones is a very strange character.
My son in law is a season ticket holder at Luton and has a friend on the staff who’s told him several instances of Nathan’s, shall we say, unusual methods of man management. One involved screaming the lyrics of”My Way” into the face of a player who disagreed with him.
Very strongly rumoured that Nathan and Luton’s CEO haven’t spoken face to face since his return from Stoke, they speak through intermediaries.
Also, next time Saints are on the telly, look at Jones fingers. They are all taped because he chews his nails so badly during games, they bleed.
Saying that, he is a very driven individual, who could just pull it off through sheer willpower.