I'm sure that clubs wanting to offload a player (not saying that this is the case here) will happily talk to the press as a way of generating interest, as will their agent. However, I agree that anyone caught leaking information without permission is going to get the sack.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Football] Murray to Forest?
- Thread starter Munkfish
- Start date
I'm sure that clubs wanting to offload a player (not saying that this is the case here) will happily talk to the press as a way of generating interest, as will their agent. However, I agree that anyone caught leaking information without permission is going to get the sack.
BensGrandad
New member
Yes but the principal is the same leaking club information and I am sure the club would take a more serious view of somebody in the privileged position of being in the know doing it.
Mancgull
Well-known member
He could get injured in training, but yes, more risk when playing.
More likely to be match fit if we need to recall though.
BensGrandad
New member
Surely we wouldnt be able to recall him as there are no more transfer windows after this one.
Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo
I believe in Joe Hendry
- Oct 4, 2003
- 12,063
No recall allowed in a half season loan deal.
A recall clause can only be included in a season long loan deal and can only take place during the January transfer window.
Mancgull
Well-known member
Thanks, I wasn't aware of that.
More reason to get someone else in then before we even consider letting Murray go.
FFS Albion!
Its a tabloid rumour on a Sunday..
portslade seagull
Well-known member
Madness unless they have targets lined up
DarrenFreemansPerm
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
This guy gets a lot of stuff right...
[tweet]1217104406203768833[/tweet]
[tweet]1217104406203768833[/tweet]
DarrenFreemansPerm
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
So today I have been told that Bloom didn’t consider relegation a possibility when he hired Potter and now we are allegedly considering letting Glenn Murray go to a relegation rival. Has Bloom lost it?
Forest a relegation rival?
Greg Bobkin
Silver Seagull
- May 22, 2012
- 16,034
So today I have been told that Bloom didn’t consider relegation a possibility when he hired Potter and now we are allegedly considering letting Glenn Murray go to a relegation rival. Has Bloom lost it?
Not sure who told you that, but it makes NO sense whatsoever. Regardless of how much confidence you have in any manager – not just Potter – there would HAVE to be contingency planning, should the worst happen...
As for Murray, if it happens, I'd assume an upgrade is on their way?
Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
Just to be clear I don’t believe either suggestion.
It was the silly article suggesting Newcastle and Palace I was alluding to. Forest would be a sensible move for everyone as long as we are getting a like for like replacement. If not it makes no sense at all except the club doing right by Murray.
Insel affe
HellBilly
I am guessing this is Murray wanting the move and us obliging him for services rendered, there is no way we need any transfer fee and he only had a contract until the summer so the wages can't be an issue.
I think this if true, will start a chain reaction and expect a new striker to be incoming soon then.
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
That can only mean an incoming striker is imminent. It would be a shame to have to recall Gyokeres from his loan.
albionfan37
Well-known member
I’d think at least one will be coming in if muzza goes
schmunk
Why oh why oh why?
Benteke?
albionfan37
Well-known member
Why would I want him here?
Wardy's twin
Well-known member
- Oct 21, 2014
- 8,866
We need another striker, if we let Murray go then we need two. Whether that second one is an out and out striker or an attacking CM who has demonstrated he can score is flexible.