Murray.... A bit lazy?

[The Merry Prankster]

Discuss.

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

In his first game I thought he was the new Pele but the last five times or so I have seen him he had developed into a pretty average run of the mill league 3 striker which is dissapointing. He had scored 5 but missed 10 sitters and look a long way from the finished article. Rochdale will be pleased to get £ 350000 and that was good business for them. The jury is now very much out and his is miles behind the ability of Forster.

 

[dougdeep]

I think he'll come good, the fact that he hasn't scored lately must be playing on his mind I suppose.

 

[Skaville]

If he was lazy he wouldn't be getting so many chances. He'll come good and is an excellent foil for Forster.

 

[Skaville]

PS - a great example of Glen Murray's "lazyness" was the header he nearly scored with yesterday. A mazy dribble from fairly deep in midfield, lay off to Cox and a surging run into the box to meet the cross with a powerful header that the keeper did well to save. Lazy bastard.

 

[Titanic]

Discuss.

utter nonsense.

 

[The Merry Prankster]

A deceptive style perhaps?

 

[Skaville]

A deceptive style perhaps?

No, he's just not lazy

 

[Questions]

I think his new nickname of ' One in ten Glen' is a bit strong though.

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

He's turning out to be very dissapointing lets be honest about it.

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

Infact is he better than Savage, not so sure he is actually.

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

Murray's are too good to hurry be fair

 

[Beach Hut]

I would give a player like Murray a good half a season or so to settle in.

I know it is Easter but this miracle will take a little longer.

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

He's no Messiah lets be honest

 

[Beach Hut]

He's no Messiah lets be honest

Expectation is far to high, I know we paid a lot of money but I some how think this was to show willing to fans.

He will be a very good player in time as we have seen flashes of his brilliance.

 

[Skaville]

He's turning out to be very dissapointing lets be honest about it.

I'm not at all disappointed. He has quite a few goals to his name already and get's himself into goalscoring positions more often than any Albion player since Zamora. Give him time - you'll be posting another "public apology" before too long.

Better than Savage? Absolutely. Luckier? No.

 

[dougdeep]

He was pretty poor yesterday, surprised Wendy didn't replace him with Jake for the last half hour.

 

[blockhseagull]

What rubbish.... sure he has missed a few chances but his general play has been of a very high standard. Is always available, holds the ball up reasonably well and brings other players into the game.

How someone can question is he better than Savage is a joke

 

[PCBEARDMLORD]

Discuss.

I think he is really funny, especially when he says ..

"Whats your name ?"

"Abdul"

"Beautiful British Name !!"

 

[Uncle Spielberg]

What rubbish.... sure he has missed a few chances but his general play has been of a very high standard. Is always available, holds the ball up reasonably well and brings other players into the game.

How someone can question is he better than Savage is a joke

Not sure , Savage scored again for Millwall. Not much differnce between the 2 and now its 50/50 who I want want here now. Any I will not be issuing any more public apologies, I predicted Wilkins would get us relegated, I was wrong.