Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Mohammed Kudus **Signed For West Ham 27/08**



Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
23,660
Brighton
Agreeing terms with the player doesn’t mean that much... see Moises.
I reckon they are planning their backup and I think it’s a ploy in a game of brinkmanship with Brighton.
Winstanley is probably determined to get one over us, or at least hold his own.
Romano starts most of his rumours with ‘terms agreed with player’. As you say - irrelevant. Chelsea are on an FFP tightrope so need to be really careful. Ajax on the other hand have extracted their full value for Bassey from Fulham and will demand £40m for Kudus up until the final day of the window when they’ll probably be up for a little less as he has refused to sign a long term contract. However, he’ll be gone by then. I hope it’s to us.
 




dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
16,261
London
Kudus and Caceido are completely different players. I hope they get Kudus. Our attacking midfield options are ridiculously stacked right now. We really don’t need him.
Even though he has played mostly in attack for Ajax. My Ajax mate is adamant he's really a defensive midfielder and much better in that position. He also played a fair bit in a 4-3-3 attacking and defending in the middle of the park. I think both us and Chelsea are interested in his flexibility and would use further back if required.
 


Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
23,660
Brighton
IMG_2984.jpeg
The sort of quality and flexibility we were crying out for during the fixture pile up at the end of last season.

Hopefully we can sneak in and grab him with Arsenal and Chelsea restricted by FFP.
 


pornomagboy

wake me up before you gogo who needs potter when
May 16, 2006
6,089
peacehaven
could be possible
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230730_132219_Twitter.jpg
    Screenshot_20230730_132219_Twitter.jpg
    350.8 KB · Views: 329










The Fits

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2020
10,106
Still quite a lot of noise on this even from Rom. Gone from Chelsea certainty to us very much in the hunt, suspect that's him hedging his bets but suggests he thinks we have a chance.
Kudus would be a great signing.
 






brighton_tom

Well-known member
Jul 23, 2008
5,511
Seems that Ajax have signed a replacement (of sorts) for £17m.


That’s the guy that was meant to me going to West Ham isn’t it? Some unhappy hammers at the moment. Sold their captain and signed nobody this summer I believe..
 


Springal

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2005
24,779
GOSBTS
That’s the guy that was meant to me going to West Ham isn’t it? Some unhappy hammers at the moment. Sold their captain and signed nobody this summer I believe..
Yep…. Turns out selling a player for £100M+ then trying to sign replacements makes negotiations tricky …
 






Justice

Dangerous Idiot
Jun 21, 2012
20,656
Born In Shoreham
Even though he has played mostly in attack for Ajax. My Ajax mate is adamant he's really a defensive midfielder and much better in that position. He also played a fair bit in a 4-3-3 attacking and defending in the middle of the park. I think both us and Chelsea are interested in his flexibility and would use further back if required.
He’s played one game as a defensive mid he must of been impressive.
 










GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,173
Gloucester
Kudus and Caceido are completely different players. I hope they get Kudus. Our attacking midfield options are ridiculously stacked right now. We really don’t need him.
....and at £40M he's a 'no' anyway. We've already bought a player for 50% more than our previous transfer record this summer. We are improving and getting 'bigger; in incremental steps, and it's working. Suddenly going in for much more expensive transfers could do more harm than good.
 
Last edited:


The Fits

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2020
10,106
....and at £40M he's a 'no' anyway. We've already bought a player fr 50% more than our previous transfer record this summer. We are improving and getting 'bigger; in incremental steps, and it's working. Suddenly going in for much more expensive transfers could do more harm than good.
Everyone was saying we'd never spend more than 30 million on a player and we've just spent 34 on one from the Championship. As I said to people back then, 30 would obviously happen sooner rather than later and so will 40 if it's the right player.
 




GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,173
Gloucester
Everyone was saying we'd never spend more than 30 million on a player and we've just spent 34 on one from the Championship. As I said to people back then, 30 would obviously happen sooner rather than later and so will 40 if it's the right player.
Eventually, maybe.....probably. But not yet. Going to £30M is fine for now.
 


Couldn't Be Hyypia

We've come a long long way together
NSC Patron
Nov 12, 2006
16,716
Near Dorchester, Dorset
Everyone was saying we'd never spend more than 30 million on a player and we've just spent 34 on one from the Championship. As I said to people back then, 30 would obviously happen sooner rather than later and so will 40 if it's the right player.
And the real issue is wages. When you get to players who cost £40m, the wage demands tend to follow along. I don't think out issue is particularly with paying big fees, but we do have a strict control over wages as I understand it. This will always limit our ability to compete with the state-backed teams.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here