Typical undermining of an intelligent thread.
In my day half an orange and a B&H Gold was the fare of all the best strikers, that's where we've gone wrong
Typical undermining of an intelligent thread.
In my day half an orange and a B&H Gold was the fare of all the best strikers, that's where we've gone wrong
This has been an issue for a number of seasons. People used to chastise Stephens and Propper for their lack of goals but Bissouma hasn't offered an improvement.
That's not the role he is playing. He plays deep.
That's not the role he is playing. He plays deep.
That's not the role he is playing. He plays deep.
This very much backs up the overall impression most of us have that it is up front where we have most under performed
The midfielders finishing has been poor, but they have a dual role. In most matches they are winning the midfield battle, so they are doing one out of two.
Our strikers have neither been scoring or particularly contributing to the team in other areas
Lots of moaning about the strikers and lack of competent strikers.
Its quite interesting. Brighton strikers so far scored 11 goals (Maupay 7, Connolly 2, Welbeck 2).
That is one more goal than West Ham in 4th place.
The midfielders scored 7 goals so far.
That is 13 less than West Hams 20 (Soucek 8, Bowen 5, Lingard 3, Fornals 2, Lanzini 1, Rice 1).
Leicester strikers scored 14 goals (Vardy 12, Perez 1, Iheanacho 1). Better than the Brighton strikers? Yes, 3 more. Does 3 more take you to the Champions League?
No. Midfield goal production does.
I repeat: the Brighton midfielders scored 7 goals. Leicesters midfielders: 24 (Barnes 9, Maddison 8, Tielemans 5, Praet 1, Ndidi 1).
I've said this about twenty times on the board already, always getting the reply "... but its the strikers job to score, Clough said so in the 70s"). Fair enough. But fact remains - goal production from midfielders are very important if you want to win games, and the major difference between Brighton and the top teams. The handful more goals produced by their strikers got very limited impact compared to the ca 15 goals more that the midfielders of (pretty much every) other team scored.
So we've had 65+ attempts at the last 3 games.
But I think we need to look at where there weren't attempts.
Connolly's miss. It looked bad, but these things happen. It's forgiveable.
Missing two penalties. Again, they get missed, though it's frustrating, it's a forgiveable error
But
At the end of the match when Moder puts in a beauty of a cross, when we're desperate for a goal and nobody is attacking it. That is not forgiveable. To not be getting in there at that moment is shocking and points to the most scrambled of scrambled minds.
Here's my solution.
We put our faith in Connolly. Yes yes, he's had a couple of bad misses, but he keeps getting in there and keeps moving.
Up front with him we try Zeqiri. Again, probably not as good a player as Maupay, but it doesn't matter. Neal, for whatever reason is not in the right place mentally to score goals, he's not doing the things which could get him goals. He needs time out of the side. Zeqiri gives us the option to swing the balll into the box to compete for a header which we don't really have at the moment.
Trossard is clearly a skillful player, but has no ability to strike the ball cleanly or head the ball, and so cannot continue up front. We play him at Left Wing Back. Tell him to provide width and deliver into the box. That's his game.
Wellbeck. Sorry, but he'd be last one I picked. Let's trust and develop our players for the future
Tau. Difficult to say, as we've only seen little of him, but GP doesn't seem to trust him
Andone. He could have a part to play, and I rate him, but it's fanciful to think he's going to be able to come back in and be fully back to where he was
The team which will get the goals and wins up to the international break looks something like ....
--------------Sanchez
---------White Dunk Burn
Veltman Moder Bissouma Trossard
--------------MacAllister
-----------Connolly Zeqiri
Gross sometimes for MacAllister. Obv's Webby and Lamptey are going to be challenging for a place when fit
Lots of moaning about the strikers and lack of competent strikers.
Its quite interesting. Brighton strikers so far scored 11 goals (Maupay 7, Connolly 2, Welbeck 2).
That is one more goal than West Ham in 4th place.
The midfielders scored 7 goals so far.
That is 13 less than West Hams 20 (Soucek 8, Bowen 5, Lingard 3, Fornals 2, Lanzini 1, Rice 1).
Leicester strikers scored 14 goals (Vardy 12, Perez 1, Iheanacho 1). Better than the Brighton strikers? Yes, 3 more. Does 3 more take you to the Champions League?
No. Midfield goal production does
I repeat: the Brighton midfielders scored 7 goals. Leicesters midfielders: 24 (Barnes 9, Maddison 8, Tielemans 5, Praet 1, Ndidi 1).
I've said this about twenty times on the board already, always getting the reply "... but its the strikers job to score, Clough said so in the 70s"). Fair enough. But fact remains - goal production from midfielders are very important if you want to win games, and the major difference between Brighton and the top teams. The handful more goals produced by their strikers got very limited impact compared to the ca 15 goals more that the midfielders of (pretty much every) other team scored.
Weird thread, started by a strong supporter of Potter, basically undermining a consensus view that the only part of the team that Potter has got functioning really well is the midfield. I think there is probably something in it but really just shows how far we are away from being anything but bottom 5/6 scrappers. Hard to know where that elusive progression to the next level is going to come from except a big squad revamp. And managers who can’t work with the existing squad of players don’t tend to last too long at our club
Interesting point, which I agree with. You've said previously that you see coaching as less important as natural ability so if we dismiss this option, how do you think Potter will remedy the midfield weakness? Transfer market in the summer? Moder and Caicedo's emergence??
Interesting point, which I agree with. You've said previously that you see coaching as less important as natural ability so if we dismiss this option, how do you think Potter will remedy the midfield weakness? Transfer market in the summer? Moder and Caicedo's emergence??
Makes a bit of sense to me - but I wouldn't trust Trossard as a wing back.
If goals from midfield are part of the key, then the continual re-jigging and rotation of personnel and formation between Mac Allister, Groß, Propper, Alzate, Lallana, Trossard and Bissouma can't be helping. It certainly seemed we performed better when we played a more settled side.
Doubtless I'm wrong.
No it isn't. [MENTION=38333]Swansman[/MENTION]'s point is midfielders aren't scoring enough, not that they aren't functioning (creating chances and breaking up attacks). When they get a chance to shoot they pass or they miss more often than they should.
Also 'the next level' was simply, initially, playing actual football rather than doing the U dance (up the side and back, round the back and up the other side and back, round the back and up the other side).