The guy’s head was turned. Player of the year and all that hype. An agent who capitalised on a huge payout and untold millions for someone who couldn’t even make the Spain squad. Is he happy with what has happened, who knows?
Just the £9m per annum.Never know if true or not of course but if that is true…
Never believe these things on wages. Sure they’re not far off but just had 2 posters (@Biscuit Barrel ) say 40k a week difference in a matter of minutes… Def guesswork the we sites / reports.
Spotrac and others are total guesswork here but very accurate in the US where you’re declaring against a salary cap.Never believe these things on wages. Sure they’re not far off but just had 2 posters (@Biscuit Barrel ) say 40k a week difference in a matter of minutes… Def guesswork the we sites / reports.
If we have a fat sell on clause, I’d be very pleased about this indeed. I actually think Citeh could get him for around £35m and that Pep could reprogram him to be good again.Fully fit and still couldn’t make the squad of 20 today! What a decline/waste.
City are desperately short of a left back now, I wonder if Pep will be tempted to go back in for him in the summer? They’re probably one of the only teams who could afford him now and he’ll be desperate to go.
I think sell on clauses usually apply based on the profit the selling club make, which in this case is likely to be zero!If we have a fat sell on clause, I’d be very pleased about this indeed. I actually think Citeh could get him for around £35m and that Pep could reprogram him to be good again.
Well, if City get him for £35m (or anything under £60m) then we wouldn’t be getting anything from a sell-on.If we have a fat sell on clause, I’d be very pleased about this indeed. I actually think Citeh could get him for around £35m and that Pep could reprogram him to be good again.
You sure about that? Swear on loads of deals I’ve heard of clubs getting x % and being based on the fee? Surely there's different bespoke sell on clauses and not all following the deal you say?Well, if City get him for £35m (or anything under £60m) then we wouldn’t be getting anything from a sell-on.
They are only ever based on a % of profit, over the original selling price.
I never do, but they’re indicative.Never believe these things on wages. Sure they’re not far off but just had 2 posters (@Biscuit Barrel ) say 40k a week difference in a matter of minutes… Def guesswork the we sites / reports.
You’re correct imho.Well, if City get him for £35m (or anything under £60m) then we wouldn’t be getting anything from a sell-on.
They are only ever based on a % of profit, over the original selling price.
To be fair, neither of them would make the Spain squad either...I forgot about that aspect and yet the world’s most expensive FB with Hakimi and Hernandez.
There is that to itTo be fair, neither of them would make the Spain squad either...
Chilwell injury prone, forever long lay offs.I always thought City’s £35m was the right price for him, £65m felt like daylight robbery. I also never understood why Chelsea wanted him as they had Chillwell
The sell on is normally based on the success element only being a % of the fee above the what the original buying club paid.You sure about that? Swear on loads of deals I’ve heard of clubs getting x % and being based on the fee? Surely there's different bespoke sell on clauses and not all following the deal you say?
I think you can pretty much rule out a sell on clause when the player was sold for an amount like thatIf we have a fat sell on clause, I’d be very pleased about this indeed. I actually think Citeh could get him for around £35m and that Pep could reprogram him to be good again.
He's laughing then, a lottery winner, and can just do a "Winston Bogarde" with that sort of money.£215k per week.
Unless maybe they'd had an offer coming for Chilwell ...? but yes, it was oddI always thought City’s £35m was the right price for him, £65m felt like daylight robbery. I also never understood why Chelsea wanted him as they had Chillwell
You say ‘usually’ - HKFC said ‘only ever’ - intrigued to know the answer or how sure you both are likeThe sell on is normally based on the success element only being a % of the fee above the what the original buying club paid.
It makes sense, as imagine offloading Cucu to say a West Ham for £30m and having to pay us more as well when it’s already been a poor outcome