Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
There are thousands of legitimate studies into mobile radiation. Link one that shows it can cause cancer, coronavirus or bring about an attack from the lizard people.Seems no one has?
There are thousands of legitimate studies into mobile radiation. Link one that shows it can cause cancer, coronavirus or bring about an attack from the lizard people.Seems no one has?
... Just wish the people who discredit the conspiracies would show a bit more proof to back up their assurance. Why is their proof always something personnel about someone (in this case a scientist) and never anything to prove these theories wrong? They complain that the conspiracy theories lack any real backup or proof don't they?
I really hope you're correct and he is wrong. I really do hope we're not rolling out something which potentially damages our health during a time like this. Just wish the people who discredit the conspiracies would show a bit more proof to back up their assurance. Why is their proof always something personnel about someone (in this case a scientist) and never anything to prove these theories wrong? They complain that the conspiracy theories lack any real backup or proof don't they?
Did you read this post a page or 2 back?
Seems no one has?
simple really, most things that come to the public have been throughly investigated, researched and tested before you even hear of them. to release a new radio based technology requires years of research to understand how it works, and then thousands of man hours over many months to gain regulatory approval. often its reusing military or industrial tech thats been opened up for general use. 5G is using ex-military and telecoms industry frequencies in use for decades without any reported problems, and we know from science that the frequencies get shielded easily (cloth will do it).
so the burden of proof lies with those who, often without any technical background, regurgitate unfounded claims of non-specific, unverified dangers.
Wonder what caused the plague and Spanish flu? Tin can telephones? Carrier pigeons?
As I posted previously. This has been done to death in the letter pages of the IET (The Institution of Engineering and Technology) which is what a the Institute of Electrical Engineers is now known as. It was a regular occurrence for the subject of 3G etc to be discussed regard health risks etc. The consensus was that it was safe and that those who propose these theories don’t actually understand the science behind it. I was bored to death with repeated articles on this.
You can appreciate their position. 3 years of degree, then a PhD, chartered Engineer, many years experience only to be told by someone who doesn’t know one end of a wave guide from the other, that they are wrong and “Insert technology” is dangerous.
It is a very dry subject and I for one am glad that I ditched ‘fields and waves’ after my second year.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Of course they ****ing have. You can’t get anything done without it!!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Wonder what caused the plague and Spanish flu? Tin can telephones? Carrier pigeons?
Any chance of showing it?
There are thousands of legitimate studies into mobile radiation. Link one that shows it can cause cancer, coronavirus or bring about an attack from the lizard people.
simple really, most things that come to the public have been throughly investigated, researched and tested before you even hear of them. to release a new radio based technology requires years of research to understand how it works, and then thousands of man hours over many months to gain regulatory approval. they are quite strict about this too, as radio tech interferes with each other quite easily, so they dont want existing stuf to break. often its reusing military or industrial tech thats been opened up for general use. 5G is using ex-military and telecoms industry frequencies in use for decades without any reported problems, and we know from science that the frequencies get shielded easily (cloth will do it).
so the burden of proof lies with those who, often without any technical background, regurgitate unfounded claims of non-specific, unverified dangers.
An engineering degree and a lifetime studying the effects of radio waves is no match for a bespoke tin foil hat though, is it..................
Just wish the people who discredit the conspiracies would show a bit more proof to back up their assurance. Why is their proof always something personnel about someone (in this case a scientist) and never anything to prove these theories wrong? They complain that the conspiracy theories lack any real backup or proof don't they?
Any chance of showing it?