no, you're trying to discuss a fringe economics theory that less than 1% of economist would consider valid model. Truss's economic policy, such as it is, would be wholey based on the prevailing standard economic model, though more Austrian than Keynesian in interpretation.
You mean more batshit than Keynesian
I wasn't being serious.
That particular poster will have to sack the recent two employees they took on following the mini budget, not the only ones getting sacked
That's where the current press reports are going. Javid or Zahawi. A couple have speculated Sunak, but I would expect he'd be third choice at best currently (and likely to turn it down anyway).
@Steve Foster informed us that he was going to employ two people as a result of the quasi/Kwasi-budget (so bad they named it twice). Let's hope that process hasn't gone too far.
Sunak would be sensible but far, far too humiliating. should have be done day one as a sign of unity, moment has well passed.
I'm not sure how she could choose Sunak - they had quite different ideas on tax and the economy in the leadership election, so either Sunak would need to change his mind and get behind Truss' ideas (unlikely), or Truss would basically have to admit that her own economic policy - which she was elected by Tory members to put in place over Sunak's - was wrong. In which case, Sunak might as well be leader.
So if anyone critiques the ifs approach to economic analysis of Truss’s economic policy they will be banned?
