- Nov 11, 2009
- 12,243
Yes of course she is. She is supposedly in charge and must take responsibility.I am no political expert, but tell me. Surely Truss tells Kwasi. who she appoints as her chancellor, what economic course she wants to go down.
He comes up with the proposals, and she surely has to agree to them,
Why does she get to sack him when the country is in uproar about the mini budget, which is what she has told him to do in the 1st place?
Isn't she as much to blame as him, if not more so?
Are you still here?I’m replying to other posters who are also making the the same point over and over again by maintaining that government economic policy should be regarded in the same way as a household but I suspect it’s a fundamental principle with which you concur
I was just checking Guardian live feed and it popped up as I looked .Blimey you’re quick! I’ve just seen it on BBC politics live and you posted it before I copied the link
Who's running this country? The Krankies?
It's NSC, so it's impossible to work out if that first line is a joke or not.I knew that woman was useless, but I didn't realise she was completely and utterly freaking useless.
I'm sure Margaret Thatcher never behaved like this. All cosplay Thatcher now has left is her determination not to see her lifelong ambition to be PM, end in such ignominy. She's going to be crucified in PMQs, interviews and the media. For her own health, she should step down.
No, they're running Scotland but give it a few more minutes....Who's running this country? The Krankies?