'IF' we win 5-2, and he's responsible for all goals, sure, he's a cert for MOM, but in a game where you draw 3-3 and he doesn't score but is largely responsible for 2 of the oppositions goals, it's really not possible to be man of the match. CMS was responsible for all of our goals, how you can put a player responsible for 2 of Leeds' goals is beyond me.Why not? A goal takes up a few seconds, leaving 89 minutes for Bridcutt's performance to compensate. What if a player scores a hat-trick and is responsible for the two conceded in a 3-2 win?
Of course it's possible.