[Albion] Levi Colwill

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊









The Pilsbury Echo

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2015
404
With the important exception that we have an even more valuable player that Chelsea want to buy. We should have considerable leverage.
We don't have much leverage IF Moises really wants Arsenal. Brighton have kept their word with Alexis why would they be any different with Moises...hes not going to just go to Chelsea to appease us so we get Colwill! IF these deals happen they will be two separate ones imo.
 








hampshirebrightonboy

Well-known member
Sep 3, 2011
1,025
We don't have much leverage IF Moises really wants Arsenal. Brighton have kept their word with Alexis why would they be any different with Moises...hes not going to just go to Chelsea to appease us so we get Colwill! IF these deals happen they will be two separate ones imo.
But Mac had been with us for much longer. We should encourage our players to stay longer. If they do we bend over backwards to help them out. If not it’s the highest bidder.
 


zefarelly

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
22,787
Sussex, by the sea
Chelsea are going to struggle to attract any players with the squad they already have and no european Jaunts

*snigger*

gives Poch a chance to blood a few £50m+ players in the caramac cup though 😂
 


zefarelly

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
22,787
Sussex, by the sea
Chelsea are going to struggle to attract any players with the squad they already have and no european Jaunts

*snigger*

gives Poch a chance to blood a few £50m+ players in the caramac cup though 😂
FWLIW I'd pay up for Colwill to the difference of at leasdt what MacAllister has cost us . . . . Dunk is ageing, Websters a sick note, Van Hecke is like Colwill PL ready but not yet top 6 every week . . . All 4 are a good squad!
 




WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
27,772
But Mac had been with us for much longer. We should encourage our players to stay longer. If they do we bend over backwards to help them out. If not it’s the highest bidder.

And I believe that this is why he has gone at the price reported. I suspect that Moises would need to do another year (or two) to get that same sort of recognition from the club in terms of selling price. Of course he can still go sooner if he really wants to, but that will be reflected in the price asked :thumbsup:

Back to Colwill, there are a good few things in our favour (as there were for Liverpool with Alexis).
 




GloryDays

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2011
1,736
Leyton, E10.
Don’t rule out that instead of Colwill maybe Chelsea will see the benefit in loaning out Mudryk to us for a season so we can fix him as well and make him PL ready. Depends if Poch sees him as a first team player. The Caicedo deal may have nothing to do with Colwill at all.

Could be Mudryk loan and cash. He’s on such a long contract and had such a poor first 6 months that a season developing under a manager he already knows isn’t actually that stupid a business move. I suppose it fails if he’s cack at Brighton.
 




lizard

Well-hung member
Jul 14, 2005
3,383
Don’t rule out that instead of Colwill maybe Chelsea will see the benefit in loaning out Mudryk to us for a season so we can fix him as well and make him PL ready. Depends if Poch sees him as a first team player. The Caicedo deal may have nothing to do with Colwill at all.

Could be Mudryk loan and cash. He’s on such a long contract and had such a poor first 6 months that a season developing under a manager he already knows isn’t actually that stupid a business move. I suppose it fails if he’s cack at Brighton.

In all fairness, Mudryk on loan is about the worst idea I've seen so far this summer.
 










Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
31,265
Don’t rule out that instead of Colwill maybe Chelsea will see the benefit in loaning out Mudryk to us for a season so we can fix him as well and make him PL ready. Depends if Poch sees him as a first team player. The Caicedo deal may have nothing to do with Colwill at all.

Could be Mudryk loan and cash. He’s on such a long contract and had such a poor first 6 months that a season developing under a manager he already knows isn’t actually that stupid a business move. I suppose it fails if he’s cack at Brighton.
Why would the Albion want to bring in Mudryk - who plays as an inverted left-winger - when we already have Mitoma (who we'll want to elevate to a £70 mill player), AND we have Adingra who we'll need to give game time to in case the vultures swoop for Mitoma next summer, AND we have Joao Pedro who is not dissimilar to Mudryk?
 
Last edited:








nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
14,533
Manchester
We let White go for £50m and that was after 36 appearances in the PL, being a championship player of the season and being in the Euro 2020 England squad.

Colwill has potential but he is nowhere near the level White was when we sold him.
I agree. I think we've got a bit carried away with Colwill. He's a classy player but I'm not sure he's worth more than 40m., even in this marker I'm sure there are plenty of alternative options that will prevent us from being held to ransom.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top