leeds in administration official

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,968
Surrey
Trigger said:
Rules need changing, cannot believe any team can get away free from punishment (because that's what it is) for going into administraition.
I wonder whether the same people who bleat "get over it" to those of us who hate the idea of MK Dons will also choose to forget this absolute travesty that Leeds have got away with. Or will they be bringing this up in ten years, despite breaking no rules whatsoever (unlike the MK Dons)?
 


Apr 29, 2007
333
Leeds
League Champions 1968-69, 1973-74, 1991-92
Runners-Up 1964-65, 1965-66, 1969-70, 1970-71, 1971-72
Division Two Champions 1923-24, 1963-64, 1989-90
Division Two Runners-Up 1927-28, 1931-32, 1955-56
FA Cup Winners 1972
FA Cup Finalists 1965, 1970, 1973
League Cup Winners 1968
League Cup Finalists 1996
European Cup Finalists 1975
European Cup Winners Cup Finalists 1973
Fairs Cup Winners 1968, 1971
Fairs Cup Finalists 1967
FA Charity Shield Winners 1969, 1992
FA Youth Challenge Cup Winners 1993, 1997

Late 60's till mid 70's its such a shame we came out 2nd best and came so close so often or we could of have alot more silverwear :shootself
 
Last edited:




Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,321
Back in Sussex
Trigger said:
Rules need changing, cannot believe any team can get away free from punishment (because that's what it is) for going into administraition.

Really? So you believe, for example, that the Wrexham punishment was right?
 




hans kraay fan club

The voice of reason.
Helpful Moderator
Mar 16, 2005
62,769
Chandlers Ford
League1Champions said:
League Champions , 1991-92
League Cup Finalists 1996
FA Charity Shield Winners , 1992


Late 60's till mid 70's its such a shame we came out 2nd best and came so close so often or we could of have alot more silverwear :shootself

You really were a big team from 1966-1975, I'll grant you that. Look whats left if you take those out.
 


Don't forget teh true ownership of Elland Road is not known. And the freeholder of the site would have final say over whether the club can be sold back to Bates. The fact that the administrators have apparently agreed to sell to the old shithead quite so quickly make me think that old **** is up to his usual tricks again.
 


Marshy

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
19,956
FRUIT OF THE BLOOM
Titanic said:
Maybe, but they can give you a 10 point penalty for next season for the disgraceful pitch invasion.

Good shout deduct them 10 for the pitch invasion so they dont get away with it.:angry: :angry:
 




Apr 29, 2007
333
Leeds
UEFA Cup Semi Finals, CL Semi Finals.

Not to forget we were in contention for the Premiership title a few years ago.

Yesterday all my troubles seemed so far away..... :nono:

leeds01ri4.jpg


leeds02bi5.jpg


leeds03ee8.jpg


Dom Matteo scored a f***ing great goal in the San Siro
 


pasty

A different kind of pasty
Jul 5, 2003
31,041
West, West, West Sussex
Don't blame the club for doing it now, it's not as if they were going to stay up anyway, and a badly written rule has allowed them to do it.

However, I agree with Trigger. The 10 point deduction was brought in to try and prevent clubs going into administration as and when they deem it fit and necessary to suit themselves. A simple one line amendment to the rule should suffice:

"Should an already relegated club enter administration or, if the process of entering administration relegates a club, the 10 point deduction will become effective at the start of the following season"
 


robbied69

New member
Sep 20, 2005
1,227
North London
Bates better refund me my £2 that I put on Tuesday on Leeds staying up. Bar already lost it without a ball being kicked.

As for Leeds being deducted, we're only doing what any other team would do in this situation. I do believe, that any points deduction should be set irrespective of position as soon as rather than waiting for next season.
 




Seagull over NZ

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
1,607
Bristol
If I had the balls as a creditor I would go after Leeds in terms of trading whilst insolvent. Their debts are large but they carried buying players. Directors I believe, can be personally liable if they have been shown to be trading whilst insolvent.

Hope someone goes after them although I fear they won't. Maybe HMR&C can go after them as I'm sure they are one of the largest creditors.
 


Starry

Captain Of The Crew
Oct 10, 2004
6,733
jolsonhammond said:
Technically you didn't even bend them though, you stuck to them.. it's the fault of the rule for being flawed, not Leeds United for taking advantage of it.

Besides I won £40 on it.

some of us won a lot more than forty quid.

and quite agree that rules needs changing, the rules haven't been and we'd have been mugs not to do what we've done for the second time. a clean slate, no payments left to the rid$dale mob and the dickheads from the training ground gone.
 


Seagull over NZ

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
1,607
Bristol
pasty said:
Don't blame the club for doing it now, it's not as if they were going to stay up anyway, and a badly written rule has allowed them to do it.

However, I agree with Trigger. The 10 point deduction was brought in to try and prevent clubs going into administration as and when they deem it fit and necessary to suit themselves. A simple one line amendment to the rule should suffice:

"Should an already relegated club enter administration or, if the process of entering administration relegates a club, the 10 point deduction will become effective at the start of the following season"

Its difficult. You could say after a certain date like mid April or something but then it would be open to abuse to people who could manipulate it to their benefit for the current season.
 




Starry

Captain Of The Crew
Oct 10, 2004
6,733
Icy Gull said:
Only a fool would give that twat their money to invest and people with money aren't generally fools :lolol:

plenty of fools around with a lot of pennies burning holes in pockets. ;)
 


Starry

Captain Of The Crew
Oct 10, 2004
6,733
sully said:
The biggest crime is that it means that honest people who are owed money by the club won't get paid.

Why isn't there a law that stops Bates buying the club back?

He's just like the Majeeds on a bigger scale.

don't be so sure that the money owed to people out of leeds fc up until now was to honest people. it was owed to the fcuking cunts that were screwing us over in the very recent past. aside from the customs dudes, the honest people already lost out when the plc went into admin and was dissolved last october.
 
Last edited:


Apr 29, 2007
333
Leeds
I wish there was a law against Bates buying the club back, he can take himself and his little Chelsea rent boy buddy Wise and piss off back to London.

GET THE CHELSEA OUT OF LEEDS!
GET THE CHELSEA OUT OF LEEDS!
GET THE CHELSEA OUT OF LEEDS!
GET THE CHELSEA OUT OF LEEDS!
 


Starry

Captain Of The Crew
Oct 10, 2004
6,733
bhaexpress said:
Just read about Leeds going into administration on Ceefax, according to that the 10 point deduction could be applied next season as Leeds are effectively down already.

definitely this season. the league high hob nobs were at elland road yesterday and confirmed it in black and white with yvonne thompson. the club were ready to do this on monday but were waiting on confirmation and a signed document from the league confirming -10 was this season.
 




Starry

Captain Of The Crew
Oct 10, 2004
6,733
hans kraay fan club said:
and if you were a local business owed money by the club, and had to accept 20p in the pound or whatever, then watch as the previous owners bought the club back for f*** all then carried on as before, would you still be happy?

that's me mate. and if the club is still going i will take my % of the pound on the chin. and believe me, it's not going to be anywhere near 20p that was dished out in the past.
 


trueblue

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
10,955
Hove
sully said:
The biggest crime is that it means that honest people who are owed money by the club won't get paid.

Why isn't there a law that stops Bates buying the club back?

He's just like the Majeeds on a bigger scale.

Absolutely. People seem to think nobody gets seriously done over in all this - that it's just a clever way round the rules.

But all the people they owe money get shafted - especially the smaller businesses who can least afford it.

They've done it once before too I'm sure.. all the shareholders had to accept a ridiculous amount for ther shares after the Premiership relegation.

It's scandalous. They should be kicked out of the league and made to work their way back up.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top