If only he was doing a programme on cancel culture or something this would be great publicity.
But that would be a bit obvious
https://www.theguardian.com/culture...ow-on-woke-thought?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
Oh.
If only he was doing a programme on cancel culture or something this would be great publicity.
But that would be a bit obvious
https://www.theguardian.com/culture...ow-on-woke-thought?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
Who cares? I don't. Good for John Cleese for annoying people that are looking for a chance to be outraged though. Go on - make my day! - tell me that something on this thread's annoyed you!
I think we disagree on the type of people that are looking to be outraged
Well, we can certainly agree that you are top banana when it comes to stereotyping! "I think we can disagree on the type..." - nice huff BTW.
You do come across as an awfully annoyed person most of the time though.
If only he was doing a programme on cancel culture or something this would be great publicity.
But that would be a bit obvious
https://www.theguardian.com/culture...ow-on-woke-thought?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other
I really don't think [MENTION=3166]keaton[/MENTION] has a huff. I do think you're a bit giddy with glee though
Me? Not at all. You are comfusing me with someone who thinks they ought to be outraged - or maybe thinks I ought to be outraged. I'm (regretfully) trying to converse with one at the moment - awfuly confusing.
OK, I think John Cleese did great. Now, please tell me what I'm annoyed about, or what you think I should be annoyed about. Happy to oblige those with a need ...................
No probs. If I've accidentally incited one or two to get a bit outraged, my job here is done ............................
I’m not really sure if that many people are going to be interested in what an 82 year old white millionaire has to say about woke culture but you never know, he may be insightful. I shall not pass judgment just yet.
NB- I’m not particularly interested in what anyone has to say about Woke culture. I find the whole label divisive and tedious.
You haven't, thought
The OP was sort of an invitation but nobody has bitten. You are doing an impression of the away end who think their team have just scored up the other end, but the ball went into the side netting
Never mind. Like Cleese, it doesn't matter.
(I loved Fawlty Towers but I had to switch off the German episode when I rewatched a few years ago. I'd not noticed before that one of the Germans was crying at the end. Some time ago I had a German girlfriend and we decided to watch the Tarantino WW2 film. She got so distressed I had to take the DVD out. Our cosy little world of the 50s, 60s and 70s has gone, mate. Even if we don't always realise).
You haven't, thought
The OP was sort of an invitation but nobody has bitten. You are doing an impression of the away end who think their team have just scored up the other end, but the ball went into the side netting
Never mind. Like Cleese, it doesn't matter.
(I loved Fawlty Towers but I had to switch off the German episode when I rewatched a few years ago. I'd not noticed before that one of the Germans was crying at the end. Some time ago I had a German girlfriend and we decided to watch the Tarantino WW2 film. She got so distressed I had to take the DVD out. Our cosy little world of the 50s, 60s and 70s has gone, mate. Even if we don't always realise).
What if it is rephrased Mary Whitehouse culture?
Really? Ah well, perceptions differ. I'm happy.You haven't, though
The OP was sort of an invitation but nobody has bitten. You are doing an impression of the away end who think their team have just scored up the other end, but the ball went into the side netting
Never mind, I never much liked Fawlty Towers anyway - rarely found it funny. And I'm not annoyed about that either!Never mind. Like Cleese, it doesn't matter.
(I loved Fawlty Towers but I had to switch off the German episode when I rewatched a few years ago. I'd not noticed before that one of the Germans was crying at the end. Some time ago I had a German girlfriend and we decided to watch the Tarantino WW2 film. She got so distressed I had to take the DVD out. Our cosy little world of the 50s, 60s and 70s has gone, mate. Even if we don't always realise).
I have the same problem with that episode. I don't think it should be banned, but it shouldn't be defended on the basis of comedy alone. It cuts much deeper that that.
It is clearly a satire on British xenophobia, racism and our obsession with World War II. That's quite something for the 1970s, but it does little to challenge those views really.
My major problem (and I have the same problem with Alf Garnett) is the shows were filmed in-front of a live studio audience whose response is an integral part of the programme.
The vast majority of the audiences at that time were laughing at the racism, not laughing about the racism.
On that basis I think it's incredibly pompous to defend a programme on what the writer intended only.
I have a general problem with artists who defend their work on that basis anyway. If your very being is about provoking a response, don't start bleating when you lose control of it.
Is the episode "racist" or "anti racist" ? I think it's both simultaneously defending on how you choose to read it.
Never mind, I never much liked Fawlty Towers anyway - rarely found it funny. And I'm not annoyed about that either!
What if it is rephrased Mary Whitehouse culture?