Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
Hart hardly ever played up front with Zamora, he tended to be on the right wing.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Jake Robinson's comments in the Argus
- Thread starter Simon Morgan
- Start date
Hart hardly ever played up front with Zamora, he tended to be on the right wing.
Not true.
when we won div 3 we had brooker and jones on the wings carpenter and oawtway in the middle and hart with zamora.
Div 2 things changed abit but he was still up front a fair bit after we sacked of lehmann and steele was in and out with hart
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
No we did not.
We generally played 4-5-1 which became 4-3-3 when were attacking. Zamora was the lone striker up front, with Hart on the right and either Brooker or Jones on the left.
The following season we generally played 4-4-2, with Steele or now and then Webb up front with Zamora.
Scotty Mac
New member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 24,405
where was captain rogers then?
as i remember it, it was 4-5-1 with rogers, carpenter and oatway in the middle, hart on the right and jones or brooker on the left
i stated he was in and out in div 2 already. but he did sometimes play up front.
So if its a 4-3-3- when we were attacking he did play up front then. 4-3-3 works brilliantly if you have someone class up front. i.e forster and two pacey players on the left and right much like jones and hart......i.e cox and jake .
It also allows our midifeld as it stand to play in a 3 and westlake wouldnt look so lost on the left of this diamond.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
It comes back to the fact, that Robinson in over 100 games has not done enough to warrant being a starter.
Also why would people want to drop a player who already has 7 goals this season? Other than a few people think he is a bit lethargic and would rather have effort over quality.
Freddie Goodwin.
Well-known member
When Zamora played you didn't need anyone else up front, he was that good!
Ah, Webb. now there's a name from the past. One of Peter taylors excellent signings. At what level is he playing at now? I'd be surprised if it's at a higher level than that which taylor is managing at.
Ah, Webb. now there's a name from the past. One of Peter taylors excellent signings. At what level is he playing at now? I'd be surprised if it's at a higher level than that which taylor is managing at.
played over 100 games yes, mostly as sub, starts here the odd one their would show that he warrants a run in a half decent team at last rather than playing in pretty average to bad teams.
Most of his games were played under a long ball mcghee team and last season he was our top league scorer in a poor side. with thte quality we have now he would undoubtedly score more.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
Hammond was our top scorer last season.
He was a fringe player under McGhee, last season was his big chance as a regular and he went nearly 12 months without a league goal from his goals against Huddersfield in 2006 to his next one in the league against Walsall in October 07.
Last season he was at Woking, can't find him at a club this season. He really was utter shite.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
I think he is at AFC Wimbledon.
Silent Bob
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
- Dec 6, 2004
- 22,172
The funniest thing about Webb is that Peter Taylor actually signed him TWICE. For us and then for Hull. A damning indictment of his eye for a player.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
He still has over 100 first team appearances and has not done enough to justify being a starter.
At some point the question will have to be asked, when do the club cut their loses on him?
blockhseagull
Well-known member
Certainly not yet, even if not a starter at present time, he certainly offers something from the bench, which is more than alot of the fringe players.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
Maybe, but 100 games in and he has not done enough.
Withdean Wanderer
Banned
I think you have just hit the record for 'making the same point in the same thread'.
Congratulations!
blockhseagull
Well-known member
Enough for what ?
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
I think you have just hit the record for 'making the same point in the same thread'.
Congratulations!
It is either that or say Murray is lazy.
Anyway, leave alone, am happy in my work on this fair Friday.
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
To suggest he is really going to make it.
NSC is quick enough to write off players after a few games, yet some keep giving Robinson the benefit of the doubt, when the stats suggest otherwise.