Jack Butland rejecting Chelsea - Impressive or stupid?

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Lovecake

Member
Jul 23, 2011
290
Jack Butland rejected talking to Chelsea on the basis that he wants to play week in week out. I can't decide if this is really refreshing to hear from a young footballer who hasn't been tempted by the big time money and who just care about playing week in week out or if this is a stupid decision missing out on such a big chance to move to a huge club with better coaches and (chaces are) better wages.

BBC Sport - Jack Butland: Birmingham goalkeeper rejects Chelsea talks

What do you reckon? And what would you do in that situation?
 




Stevie Boy

Well-known member
Nov 2, 2004
6,364
Horam
Good for him, makes a change seeing someone wanting to play football instead of picking up big wages to sit on the bench
 






Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Maybe he has a word with Kuz who hardly got a game at United, after the Birmingham game,
 




Bladders

Twats everywhere
Jun 22, 2012
13,672
The Troubadour
Credit to him, if you look through Prem squads there's quite a few young English players just sitting on their hands playing some reserve football.

Better off playing and securing a bigger move later on in your career.
 


JBizzle

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2010
6,232
Seaford
impressive: They already have Thibault Courtois who is a fantastic 'keeper and Cech still has a couple of years in him. Butland is good enough to go to a decent club and be no. 1, not waste away in the ressies until the big guns retire.
 


shaolinpunk

[Insert witty title here]
Nov 28, 2005
7,187
Brighton
He'll still move to a premier league club so it isn't THAT big a risk saying no.

Talk that Liverpool are interested in which case he could oust Reina by the start of next season
 






Dec 29, 2011
8,205
They have Cech who has at least 5 years left in him, and Courtois who is the same age as Butland and more highly rated. He'd have been stupid to move to Chelsea. Arsenal would be a better move, they struggle for solid keepers and need English players too.
 


JBizzle

Well-known member
Apr 18, 2010
6,232
Seaford
Good for him, makes a change seeing someone wanting to play football instead of picking up big wages to sit on the bench

Scott Parker (Chelsea); Shaun Wright-Phillips (Chelsea); Steve Sidwell (Chelsea); Jack Rodwell (Man City); Scott Sinclair (Man City); Daniel Sturridge (Chelsea); Ben Foster (Man Utd); I'm sure there's many, many more... Its no wonder our England team is perennially tin-pot when all of our youth players go and sit on the bench at top clubs and never get a game.
 




Garry Nelson's Left Foot

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
13,528
tokyo
Impressive. His career will most likely stagnate if he goes to Chelsea, a la Foster at man u, Carson at Liverpool and Turnbull at Chelsea. He's a goalkeeper so he's got a long, long career ahead of him, he'll get there soon enough and with a team that he'll get games for. From there he can establish himself and become a credible alternative to Hart.
 




Lovecake

Member
Jul 23, 2011
290
I agree with all you've said and I reckon it's great to see but then put yourself in his shoes and you start thinking - I could be playing for the European Champions but instead I'm happy at Birmingham. That makes it seem a bit nuts - valid point about othe prem clubs being interested. Really hope he only goes somewhere he gets a regular game
 


















Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top