HAILSHAM SEAGULL
Well-known member
- Nov 9, 2009
- 10,359
He probably will, he is the best player in the world.....but he shouldnt be in the tournement now.
I would love it, if he smashed his way through the field to win now...
That is bullcrap
1990 Norman disqualifies himself after a round when he carried out an illegal drop (same as Tiger)
1992 Nick Faldo disqualified from a tournament for signing an incorrect card
Same tournament Nick Price disqualified himself after failing to mark a penalty for caddie moving and imovable object.
1995 Faldo again disqualified for signing an incorrect score card not having realised he had broken a local rule.
2011 Harrington for signing an incorrect scorecard.
Many others are listed. Nearly all are disqualified for signing an incorrect score card after a penalty they did not realised they had incurred.
Oh, sorry this is Tiger so we must make an exception. As Tiger said yesterday 'rules are rules...'
If he carries on I will lose a lot more respect for him.
Do you have a wager on him Kev?
Yes lol....
Its a difficult decision for them to have made, to be fair, you've got to think, well if we DQ him, the interest will subside a little and the crowds will hate it because they absolutely adore tiger in the US. I think taking history out, a 2 shot penalty seems fair to me, does he really deserve to be thrown out for something that isn't deliberate cheating? I know I'm going against the grain but I hope he carries on. I'm not an avid golf watcher mind but to me, if Woods isn't there, I'm far less likely to tune in.
I don't go in for this conspiracy theory nonsense, but it seems you're dead right. What a sham.He did and he knows it. He dropped it back to the left and to far behind. Its Wood so he'll get away with it but anyone else they'd be disquilyed.
Exactly. Some nonsense read out about HD footage - it wasn't footage that showed him to be wrong, he said he went back 2 yards to gain an advantage.I actually have to post this though, a rule change made last year means that if the committee believes (cop out)
..the competitor could not reasonably have known or discovered the facts resulting in his breach of the Rules, it would be justified under Rule 33-7 in waiving the disqualification penalty prescribed by Rule 6-6d.
But 'HE DID KNOW', he said as much, and the rule is clear ...
Ah yes, but there's some secret rules that say you can't DQ Tiger.I'm afraid that they will have to DQ him. He opted to retake the shot but said in an interview that he wanted to add two yards on the shot whereas the ball had to be dropped where he took the previous shot from.
They have no choice. As Tiger said when the 14 year old was penalised for slow play, "Rules is rules".
I actually have to post this though, a rule change made last year means that if the committee believes (cop out)
..the competitor could not reasonably have known or discovered the facts resulting in his breach of the Rules, it would be justified under Rule 33-7 in waiving the disqualification penalty prescribed by Rule 6-6d.
But 'HE DID KNOW', he said as much, and the rule is clear ...
Its a difficult decision for them to have made, to be fair, you've got to think, well if we DQ him, the interest will subside a little and the crowds will hate it because they absolutely adore tiger in the US. I think taking history out, a 2 shot penalty seems fair to me, does he really deserve to be thrown out for something that isn't deliberate cheating? I know I'm going against the grain but I hope he carries on. I'm not an avid golf watcher mind but to me, if Woods isn't there, I'm far less likely to tune in.
He has an hour to redeem himself. Maybe Nicklaus or Watson is out there trying to persuade him to do the right thing?
Just started he's round.