Man of Harveys
Well-known member
Not English enough for the mongs and not stupid enough to want to bring the personal abuse that goes with the job on himself, at a guess.Hannibal smith said:What was wrong with Martin O’Neil?
Not English enough for the mongs and not stupid enough to want to bring the personal abuse that goes with the job on himself, at a guess.Hannibal smith said:What was wrong with Martin O’Neil?
Man of Harveys said:Not English enough for the mongs and not stupid enough to want to bring the personal abuse that goes with the job on himself, at a guess.
Meade's_Ball said:And didn't Platt become a better player in travel? I personally think he was a bit rubbish before and after, but he learnt to understand the strengths of his game more.
Man of Harveys said:Not English enough for the mongs and not stupid enough to want to bring the personal abuse that goes with the job on himself, at a guess.
Hannibal smith said:On the broader point England were awful in the last world cup. We beat Ecuador, Paraguay and T&T with no more than 2 goals scored in a match against, in some cases, part time defences. We drew against an average Swedish team and went out on Pens to Portugal who were comfortably the worst of the last 4 teams left in. It is surely re-writing history to suggest Sven was a good manager who got the best out of the team. His was mediocre. Steve 3-5-2 Mclaren is worse.
What was wrong with Martin O’Neil?
Personally, I'd say that all national associations have to operate within the context that they find themselves and if that includes, say, a German coach winning the Euros for Greece, so be it - those are the parameters. England's current dilemma involves Fleet Street and many England fans wanting to rise above That Sort Of Thing, which is a square peg in a round hole.Les Biehn said:MoH, what did you think of my statement that I wanted an English coach on the grounds of sporting rather than nationalistic reasons.