- Oct 17, 2008
- 14,325
Sorry that didn't make sense, I rather spluttered through my Cornflakes.
Firstly, the majority of high-profile critics do an excellent job. Their expertise is putting the current film/production in context in the world and history of film/theatre. In the same way as one would trust the word of John Motson on what makes a good football match, rather than someone who goes once or twice a season.
I think I reacted to what came across as a bit of pomposity verging on the arrogant, but words on a screen are just that - words, so this is not personal! Declaring oneself 'published and active' is a bit of a target, especially as you do theatre. I do take issue with your being 'less accepting of mediocrity than the average patron' however. Maybe you meant that having seen so much, you have a wider experience of what is truly great but I would suggest that being a generally PAYING punter, I am more likely to have a stronger 'unacceptance' of mediocrity than you are. Most people have had free tickets to films and theatre; I bet that paying through the nose for a top seat heightens one's reaction - that was great/bloody awful what a rip-off.
A bad production to you sits in comparison with everything else you've seen. A bad production to me is an utter waste of time and money and I'm cross they get away with it.
Fair?
Absolutely. In truth, my comments became somewhat affected and spikey latterly in the thread, solely due to US's odd reaction - he did ask for people's opinions after all.
And you've hit the nail on the head with the whole comp culture thing - however my comps don't extend to Friday night movies with the girlfriend! Regardless, I always try to be fair and balanced when watching anything (including the football/cricket - even when supporting the Albion or Sussex), as I feel I was in my initial brief review of the movie - a movie I gave a decent review to anyway!!