Malan gone, let the collapse commence
Why did they play Brook?Why didn't Brook play before? Clearly the future...
163-3
Not ideal that Stokes wasn't backing up at all that ball. At this point I'd rather Stokes had been run out (and then kept going straight to the hospital to have his operation).Crazy run from Malan there. I'd love to be a fly on the wall in the English changing room. I bet his equipment is flying round right now...
Just goes to show he knows F all. England truly are a pile of crap right now.178-5. England are making a right mess of this. Absolutely crazy to see the difference from the series in The Netherlands in June last year.
Michael Vaughan wrote this just half an hour ago.
View attachment 169366
Do you think Buttler’s batting is affecting his captaincy? Maybe he shouldn’t be asked to bat, the difference would have been marginal in this tournament anyway.Just goes to show he knows F all. England truly are a pile of crap right now.
One shot here doesn't reflect upon his record, I would suggest you look at his stats...Why did they play Brook?
164-4
I’m just pulling your plonker mate, didn’t realise I was up against Andy Zaltzman!One shot here doesn't reflect upon his record, I would suggest you look at his stats...
We had some Sussex born representation yesterday when England fielding coach Carl Hopkinson was bizarrely put up in front of the media ahead of the game instead of somebody more senior.It's a shame that Fred Klaasen isn't involved in the Dutch squad for this world cup. We could have had some Sussex-born representation! (Haywards Heath born with a Dutch grandfather). He missed out due to injury.
By that logic our test team should be full of Surrey players.I'm not saying it's the fault of the northerners per se, but after a summer where southern teams dominated the Royal London Cup, Hundred and T20 Blast we've taken essentially a squad full of northerners to the world cup and they've crashed and burned
The south is just better at cricket and they need to accept that
They've been so bad I've gone straight through "annoyance" and "sadness" to "hilarity".Bit of a sad ending for a great generation of English cricketers this, isn't it?
Strong disagree. If they're playing for England they're not playing for Surrey, thus relegating them.By that logic our test team should be full of Surrey players.
I cannot support this logic.
I considered that and decided the prospect of Surrey still winning the championship while missing a load of England players was both too likely and too annoying to be worth the risk.Strong disagree. If they're playing for England they're not playing for Surrey, thus relegating them.