This.£50m plus a sell on clause
Very pleasing that most of us have a similar view and have not given up on the lad.
Albeit, the right offer is always a right offer.
This.£50m plus a sell on clause
Who’s going to get upset and argue? Evan? Posters on here?speculation is going to fuel even more upset and arguments …
I think West Ham would tbh. They offered £57m for Duran (which AV rejected).I've gone £50m + a percentage sell on, as I don't think anyone will pay that and I'd rather keep him
But every player has his price for goodness sake, just common sense.
Take a look at the Ferguson and Transfer threads.Who’s going to get upset and argue? Evan? Posters on here?
Not my intent. Apologies if you felt that.I felt your response was patronising.
((I’m glad this site allows us to express our respective, differing and legitimate POVs though without condemnation and put down from others)
What's the minimum offer you would accept?
I think it’s just you getting upset.Take a look at the Ferguson and Transfer threads.
Yes, I know NSC loves a binfest
'Why fuel speculation?'I think West Ham would tbh. They offered £57m for Duran (which AV rejected).
The sell on is crucial isn’t it?!.
He's contracted until June 2029.How long left on his contract? Need to know that before answering.
Not my intent. Apologies if you felt that.
Instead, my post was intended to convey the irritation that I felt at reading what I see to be yet another attempt to be the unofficial NSC transfer monitor.
Me too.
I will happily let it go.Another baiting comment.
Why get irritated? You are reading far too much into my intentions - You got that one wrong too about the comment I made to another member the other day that our MUTUAL discussion might for another thread because we were getting off tangent - it is NOT “moderating” a thread to suggest that we both let a discussion go if it is getting too off tangent, posters do it all the time. Nor was me asking why (a question!) start something that would fuel even more unfounded speculation and give weight to rumour?
I would suggest we let this go to so this thread doesn’t become even more derailed but I am concerned you will get ‘irritated‘ again and tell me I was trying to be a ‘thread monitor’ in the hope you will get more thumbs up….
So just for you
Gyokeres was one of those things that will happen now and again. No one could have predicted he would get this good at the time but we did well out of the Undav deal.We will sell him, Danny will get crocked again and Ferguson will be turning it on at another club whilst we wipe the egg of our faces. Would be madness to sell him. Kid needs time and games. We've already let Gyökeres and Undav go, let's not make it a hat-trick of 'why did we let him go' whilst we are scraping around trying to find a forward to cover for Danny.
£60million and no less.