severnside gull
Well-known member
Please allow me the pleasure of bouncing this posting sometime during 2011
my pleasure
the market will doubtless have slipped further by then but I bet it still won't have crashed
Please allow me the pleasure of bouncing this posting sometime during 2011
In 2007 mortgage lending was £ 366 billion. In 2010 it was £ 137 billion and expectations this year are the lowest ever mortgage lending since records began of £ 130 billion.
The 3.4% applies only to 2010. If you want to reference the world financial crisis then quoted figures showed an average decline from Apr 07 to Dec 08 of about 13-15% (adjusted for inflation this was about 20% fall).
The upward blip during 2009 was due to 1. lack of supply 2. bank of mum and dad 3. low interest rates and 4. ramping by anyone with a vested interest to capture the gullible (estate agents etc).
1-2 are largely over and 3 will reverse eventually. 4 is the only thing that remains constant. You can add to this growing unemployment.
Therefore there is a lack of supply versus demand, therefore the prices more or less stagnate. This state will go on for a decade or more in my opinion, due to the austerity measures and the reasons given above, crash?? Cant happen if people dont/cant move house, especially as the potential buyers cant get a mortgage aswell!!
This is completely fictitious - its like holding shares and saying they cant drop in price if I don't sell them. It may only apply if nobody sells.
Some houses will have to sell because of divorces, death, job moves, redundancies, immigration etc etc.
It takes just one house in a street to set the level for that street and just a few houses in a district to set the level for that district. Neither the Government nor the individual will have any control over it.
As for lack of mortgages, when house prices are restored to historical levels (rather than a bubble) then mortgages will once again be achievable. The banks have a pretty good idea that the market is going down, thats why many want as much as 40% deposit and why their risk is reflected in mortgage rates many multiples of the base rate. Think that sends out a pretty clear message.
Thats rubbish. Lenders wanted 40% in 2008 and 2009 in a rising market when prices went up 15%.
I'd be f***ing delighted with that!! I got a interest only mortgage at around 3.2% last year fixed for 2 years last summer, and I was over the moon with it. In fact I'd probably be delighted with 5-6% if I could fixed it long enough." Just 16% of homeowners would only be happy with a fixed rate deal of 2% or less for the next three years. "
Earth calling. Is there anyone in ?.
Thats because they knew that rise was only a blip. But I'm not allowed to call it that. Banks are multinational and they only have to look at the USA, Spain, Ireland, Australia to see what could become a reality here.