Return of the Rev
Well-known member
Gus threatening to leave! Not possible
5 games 3 wins.
I think the best way DOF works is if the manager gives a list of players he would be happy with for a certain position and the DOF works from the top down in trying to bring them in. Also I assume he has the responsibility of putting forward researched names for positions that the manager wants to fill but ultimately the manager really must have the final say from the list that meet the budget requirementRegardless of Gus and his assorted shenanigans...
I struggle to understand the logic of the reason for having a Director of Football who makes the signings that the manager then has to fit into his team. Unless the manager and the Director of Football have exactly the same perspective on all things football, it can't really work, can it?
Interested if anyone has any examples to prove me wrong...
I think we should speculate on who the player was that would cause Poyet to walk out the job. Glenn Murray?
I'm perhaps a little less shocked by this than most Sunderland supporters because I followed his career quite closely while at B&HA; I still think it's rather reprehensible.
He's correct to be fighting his case with Ellis Short regarding the signings being his choices, not De Fanti's, but to go public when you're five matches into the job is not the way I believe a manager should behave. I'm all too aware that is an early reminder of Poyet's reign at B&HA.
Once Paolo had been so unjustly fired Gus was the man I wanted, but this story reinforces Di Canio's claim that De Fanti delivered virtually none of Paolo's first or second choices and left him to work with a dozen new men that he hadn't really wanted, only a couple of whom have featured since Poyet's arrival.
I find it grossly unfair that Paolo Di Canio is viewed the length and breadth of this land as a crazy unemployable failure, when he kept his feelings in house until he was given the push after just thirteen matches "in charge". I suppose Gus is covering his back from the start.
I'm perhaps a little less shocked by this than most Sunderland supporters because I followed his career quite closely while at B&HA; I still think it's rather reprehensible.
He's correct to be fighting his case with Ellis Short regarding the signings being his choices, not De Fanti's, but to go public when you're five matches into the job is not the way I believe a manager should behave. I'm all too aware that is an early reminder of Poyet's reign at B&HA.
Once Paolo had been so unjustly fired Gus was the man I wanted, but this story reinforces Di Canio's claim that De Fanti delivered virtually none of Paolo's first or second choices and left him to work with a dozen new men that he hadn't really wanted, only a couple of whom have featured since Poyet's arrival.
I find it grossly unfair that Paolo Di Canio is viewed the length and breadth of this land as a crazy unemployable failure, when he kept his feelings in house until he was given the push after just thirteen matches "in charge". I suppose Gus is covering his back from the start.
Well (unsurprisingly) the Guardian article makes it far less dramatic than the other sources. .
which shows why Gus is right to put it out in the open. At the end of the day, in football the buck always stops with the manager.
If he's so right, give me some examples of other managers who do their player negotiations with the hierarchy of their club through the media?
To be clear, I don't actually disagree with Gus' opinion on this, it's just the gobbing off to the press that I find so unprofessional.