Barbs sounds pretty passionate there.
Not heard him so animated.
So he should be. It’s a matter than needs addressing today other than tomorrow.
There’s no solution here to suit all here. Logical pros and cons to both sides of the argument. It’s a matter of choosing your poison.
Whatever happens we can guarantee the virus will spread regardless. I’m of the view that the poison of keeping grounds closed is more detrimental than the chance of people catching COVID at a ground. If grounds stay closed jobs will be lost. Not just the playing and backroom staff, but also the many secondary businesses that rely on football to be played with fans. What are the government doing to support coach firms? What about the mortgages the drivers have to pay? Just one sector within the footballing world that’s being crippled right now.
Providing the attendees are protected with additional measures to protect the vulnerable, I can’t see how this is any more dangerous than thousands of people leaving pubs and bars in city centres at 10PM every night. Jobs and livelihoods are on the line and the lower leagues lay the foundation for the whole footballing pyramid. What about the mental well-being of the fans and people involved with the clubs? Any closures and mental health will tank, depression will rise and this is a very real threat. COVID is here to stay regardless of fans being socially distanced at a football stadium of not. What a **** situation we are in.