Rusthall Seagull
New member
probably, does it make it less cringeworthy at the labour conference if thats the case ?
nope, but why mention it ?
probably, does it make it less cringeworthy at the labour conference if thats the case ?
er, because its cringeworthy.nope, but why mention it ?
Still Gordons going to cure Cancer. Way to go.
er, because its cringeworthy.
.
Say it enough times and people will believe it. Just cos Brown tells you it is not necessarily true.
I don’t need Gordon Brown to keep telling me. I have the Tory party itself i.e one of its own MEPs that says the NHS was a 60 year mistake. Maybe a maverick, but probably speaks for a lot of Tories.
Plus, why did the Tories starve the NHS and Education of funds during their 18 years in power? Probably to starve of it resources and for it to be so decrepid that people have no choice but to go privately…….a slow death, but a death nonetheless.
The Tories will scrape home, just beating a hastily formed Lib Lab pact when it becomes obvious that a Labour party featuring ineffectual gimps like Gormless Brown and Harlet Harboy cut no ice with the electorate. The excitement generated by the Lib Lab thing v the Tories will squeeze out two bob thicky parties like the BNP, who will be popped safely back in their box.
They will then be utter shithouse for years with the usual array of posh wet lettuce front benchers, and they won't change anything except for making massive cuts and blaming Labour for it. Gareth will still be selling 6 mortgages a month in 2013 and it'll still be Gordon Brown's fault.
Still Gordons going to cure Cancer. Way to go.
He actually said that!?!??!
So you based your whole rationale on what a maverick or prick would be a better word says. Because he says it ALL tories are evil bastards just waiting and salivating at the thought of coming into power and closing all the hospitals down. Still as I say if you peddle the lie enough I suppose some mugs may believe it.
see israel and italy's countless changes of government for the reasons that this is not the case, if you want the BNP and lots of other fringe single interest parties to be able to hold governments to ransom, then proportional representation is the way to go.Unless Labour vows for PR, which will be good for Politics, abalanced electoral system and more consensus.
Not a Republican,Clapham i just happen to think the electorate should decide who is P/M. I