Kestrel (Wild) from last week
Nice shot Kneon, nice and sharp and nice bokeh, just a shame that the claw is obscuring the beak
What lens please?
Kestrel (Wild) from last week
Nice shot Kneon, nice and sharp and nice bokeh, just a shame that the claw is obscuring the beak
Can I draw the photography types' attention to this thread please:
https://nortr3nixy.nimpr.uk/showthread.php?336335-On-The-Bench-(Photo-Competition)-Help-Needed!
Thanks.
I keep telling myself I need to get to grips with this thread, but it's a bit daunting. I WILL make the effort to join in soon, though. Promise!
Nice shot Kneon, nice and sharp and nice bokeh, just a shame that the claw is obscuring the beak
What lens please?
Canon 400mm F5.6
I wish I had got a Canon (instead of Nikon). Lots of reasons I found out afterwards. Nikon does not seem to have an alternative to the 400 m Canon prime (if I could afford it?) which seems very good judging by results.
I'm very happy with my Nikon 80-400mm.I wish I had got a Canon (instead of Nikon). Lots of reasons I found out afterwards. Nikon does not seem to have an alternative to the 400 m Canon prime (if I could afford it?) which seems very good judging by results.
I'm very happy with my Nikon 80-400mm.
Here's a Kingfisher I took last May.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/128321708@N03/16991662784/in/album-72157652379520809/
Anyone here gone "mirrorless" thinking of a Sony Ar7II for next body upgrade - currently pootling along with my Canon 550d
It keeps the price down, and the weight. I imagine the same applies to the cheapest Canons?It is only the cheap Nikons that I would not recommend, as I bought one. te absence of a built-in focus motor on the Nikon D3000 and D5000 series and the absence of the Commander flash mode of these series of cameras is a disadvantage. I don't know of this keeps the weight down or not?
Canon and Nikon have been doing this for a long time, they know what they're doing. What are you finding frustrating that you couldn't fix by getting a different model?Myself, I hope the competition will provoke Canon and Nikon to improve their DSLRs as they can be a bit frustrating.
It keeps the price down, and the weight. I imagine the same applies to the cheapest Canons?
Canon and Nikon have been doing this for a long time, they know what they're doing. What are you finding frustrating that you couldn't fix by getting a different model?
Don't all Canons rely on the lens having the AF motor? And with Nikon, some lenses have a motor, some don't, it's not related to whether they're third party or not.It does now as one of the recent Canons do not have the flash Commander TTL mode, but otherwise the Canons were better in this respect (except for the very cheapest) especially the 550D.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_flash_system
Built in focus motor helps with autofocus on third party lens.
Don't all Canons rely on the lens having the AF motor? And with Nikon, some lenses have a motor, some don't, it's not related to whether they're third party or not.
I don't know what your complaint / concern is about the competition for Canon and Nikon. What are other manufacturers doing that they're not?
I'm confused - third party lenses for the Canon would also require an AF motor wouldn't they?Or I get the Nikon D5500, try and find a compatible flashgun to act as Commander () and forego the cheap third party lens (or very old Nikon lens) for auto focusing. An extra £600 because the base camera is limited compared to the Canon equivalent.
Oh yeah! And then I found this guy. Kudos!
I'm confused - third party lenses for the Canon would also require an AF motor wouldn't they?